Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29463210›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Barriers to and strategies for addressing the availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality of the sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn and adolescent health workforce: addressing the post-2015 agenda.

Caroline S E Homer, Sofia Castro Lopes, Andrea Nove, Michaela Michel-Schuldt, Frances McConville, Nester T Moyo, Martha Bokosi, Petra Ten Hoope-Bender

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Designing Routine Health Checkups for Adolescents in Zimbabwe.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caroline S E HomerCentre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, University of Technology Sydney, City campus, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
Sofia Castro LopesInstituto de Cooperación Social Integrare, Calle Balmes, 30, 3° - 1, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.
Andrea NoveInstituto de Cooperación Social Integrare, Calle Balmes, 30, 3° - 1, 08007, Barcelona, Spain. andrea@novametrics.org.
Michaela Michel-SchuldtUNFPA, 11-13 Chemin des Anémones, 1219 Chatelaine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Frances McConvilleWHO, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, 27, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nester T MoyoInternational Confederation of Midwives (ICM), Laan van Meerdervoort 70, 2517, AN, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Martha BokosiInternational Confederation of Midwives (ICM), Laan van Meerdervoort 70, 2517, AN, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Petra Ten Hoope-BenderUNFPA, 11-13 Chemin des Anémones, 1219 Chatelaine, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1094652World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a post-2015 development agenda, achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC) for women and newborns will require a fit-for-purpose and fit-to-practice sexual, reproductive, maternal, adolescent and newborn health (SRMNAH) workforce. The aim of this paper is to explore barriers, challenges and solutions to the availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality (AAAQ) of SRMNAH services and workforce.

methodsThe State of the World's Midwifery report 2014 used a broad definition of midwifery ("the health services and health workforce needed to support and care for women and newborns") and provided information about a wide range of SRMNAH workers, including doctors, midwives, nurses and auxiliaries. As part of the data collection, 36 out of the 73 participating low- and middle-income countries conducted a one-day workshop, involving a range of different stakeholders. Participants were asked to discuss barriers to the AAAQ of SRMNAH workers, and to suggest strategies for overcoming the identified barriers. The workshop was facilitated using a discussion guide, and a rapporteur took detailed notes. A content analysis was undertaken using N-Vivo software and the AAAQ model as a framework.

resultsAcross the 36 countries, about 800 participants attended a workshop. The identified barriers to AAAQ of SRMNAH workers included: insufficient size of the workforce and inequity in its distribution, lack of transportation, user fees and out of pocket payments. In some countries, respondents felt that women mistrusted the workforce, and particularly midwives, due to cultural differences, or disrespectful behaviour towards service users. Quality of care was undermined by a lack of supplies/equipment and inadequate regulation. Against these, countries identified a set of solutions including adequate workforce planning supported by a fast and equitable deployment system, aligned with the principles of UHC. Acceptability and quality could be improved with the provision of respectful care as well as strategies to improve education and regulation.

conclusionsThe number and scale of the barriers still needing to be addressed in these 36 countries was significant. Adequate planning and policies to support the development of the SRMNAH workforce and its equitable distribution are a priority. Enabling strategies need to be put in place to improve the status and recognition of midwives, whose role is often undervalued.

Indexed as

MidwiferyAdolescentCommunication BarriersFemaleGlobal HealthHealth Services AccessibilityHealth WorkforceHumansInfant HealthInfant, NewbornMaleMaternal Health ServicesNeeds AssessmentPregnancyQuality of Health CareReproductive Health ServicesAcceptabilityAccessibilityAvailabilityEffective coverageHealth workforceQualitativeQualitySRMNAH careUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID29463210
PMCPMC5819639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.