Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29462894›Full record

ArticleGenes2018

Modeling the Role of Wnt Signaling in Human and Drosophila Stem Cells.

Prameet Kaur, Helen Jingshu Jin, Jay B Lusk, Nicholas S Tolwinski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Novel systems to study vector-pathogen interactions in malaria.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Targeting the Wnt Signaling Pathway in Liver Fibrosis for Drug Options: An Update.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Prameet KaurYale-NUS College Research Labs @ E6, E6, 5 Engineering Drive 1, #04-02, Singapore 117608, Singapore. prameet.kaur@yale-nus.edu.sg.
Helen Jingshu JinYale-NUS College Research Labs @ E6, E6, 5 Engineering Drive 1, #04-02, Singapore 117608, Singapore. jingshu.jin@u.yale-nus.edu.sg.
Jay B LuskYale-NUS College Research Labs @ E6, E6, 5 Engineering Drive 1, #04-02, Singapore 117608, Singapore. jay.lusk@u.yale-nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-5728-8872
Nicholas S TolwinskiYale-NUS College Research Labs @ E6, E6, 5 Engineering Drive 1, #04-02, Singapore 117608, Singapore. nicholas.tolwinski@yale-nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-8507-2737

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, barely more than a decade ago, dramatically transformed the study of stem cells and introduced a completely new way to approach many human health concerns. Although advances have pushed the field forward, human application remains some years away, in part due to the need for an in-depth mechanistic understanding. The role of Wnts in stem cells predates the discovery of iPS cells with Wnts established as major pluripotency promoting factors. Most work to date has been done using mouse and tissue culture models and few attempts have been made in other model organisms, but the recent combination of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) gene editing with iPS cell technology provides a perfect avenue for exploring iPS cells in model organisms.

Indexed as

Drosophilainduced pluripotent stem cellsstem cellsWnt

Identifiers

PMID29462894
PMCPMC5852597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.