Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29462506›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical pharmacology2018

Evaluation of Flexible Tacrolimus Drug Concentration Monitoring Approach in Patients Receiving Extended-Release Once-Daily Tacrolimus Tablets.

Benjamin Philosophe, Nicolae Leca, Patricia M West-Thielke, Timothy Horwedel, Christine Culkin-Gemmell, Kristin Kistler, Daniel R Stevens

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02339246 (A Steady-state Pharmacokinetic Comparison Of All FK-506 Formulations), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02339246 phase3completednot on this map

A Steady-state Pharmacokinetic Comparison Of All FK-506 Formulations

TypeinterventionalSponsorVeloxis PharmaceuticalsRan2015 to 2015Enrolled32ConditionsRenal FailureArmsPrograf vs Envarsus XR vs Astagraf XL, Prograf vs Astagraf XL vs Envarsus XR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dosing strategies forWorld journal of transplantation · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benjamin PhilosopheJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nicolae LecaUniversity of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Patricia M West-ThielkeUniversity of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
Timothy HorwedelBarnes Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Christine Culkin-GemmellHahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kristin KistlerEvidera, Waltham, MA, USA.
Daniel R StevensVeloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of United States kidney transplant patients are treated with tacrolimus, a drug effective in preventing graft rejection, but with a narrow therapeutic range, necessitating close monitoring to avoid increased risks of transplant rejection or toxicity if the tacrolimus concentration is too low or too high, respectively. The trough drug concentration tests are time sensitive; patients treated on a twice-daily basis have blood draws exactly 12 hours after their previous dose. The schedule's rigidity causes problems for both patients and health care providers. Novel once-daily tacrolimus formulations such as LCPT (an extended-release tablet by Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) have allowed for blood draws on a once-daily basis; however, even that schedule can be restrictive. Results from tests taken either before or after that 24-hour target time may be discarded, or worse, may lead to inappropriate dose changes. Data from ASTCOFF, a phase 3B pharmacokinetic clinical trial (NCT02339246), demonstrated that the unique pharmacokinetic curve of LCPT may allow for a therapeutic monitoring window that extends for 3 hours before or after the 24-hour monitoring target. Furthermore, important tools to help clinicians interpret these levels, such as formulas to estimate the 24-hour trough level if an alternative monitoring time is used, were constructed from these data. These study results give treating clinicians access to data that allow them to safely use and monitor LCPT in their patients and expand the body of evidence surrounding differentiation and practical application of the novel LCPT tacrolimus formulation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArea Under CurveDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleDrug CompoundingDrug MonitoringFemaleGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisTabletsImmunosuppressive AgentsTabletsTacrolimuscalcineurin inhibitordailymonitoringpharmacokinetics and drug metabolismrenal diseasetacrolimustransplantation (TRP)

Identifiers

PMID29462506
PMCPMC6032903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.