Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29462493›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2018

Short delay in initiation of radiotherapy for patients with glioblastoma-effect of concurrent chemotherapy: a secondary analysis from the NRG Oncology/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group database.

Deborah T Blumenthal, Minhee Won, Minesh P Mehta, Mark R Gilbert, Paul D Brown, Felix Bokstein, David G Brachman, Maria Werner-Wasik, Grant K Hunter, Egils Valeinis and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Deborah T BlumenthalTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Minhee WonNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Minesh P MehtaBaptist Hospital of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Mark R GilbertNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Paul D BrownUniversity of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Felix BoksteinTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
David G BrachmanSaint Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center ACCRUALS for Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Maria Werner-WasikThomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Grant K HunterIntermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah, USA.
Egils ValeinisPaulus Stradins Clinical University Hospital-EORTC, Riga, Latvia.
Kirsten HopkinsBristol Oncology Center-EORTC, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Luis SouhamiMcGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Steven P HowardUniversity of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Frank S LiebermanUPMC-Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Dennis C ShrieveUniversity of Utah Health Science Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Merideth M WendlandWillamette Valley Cancer Institute, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Cliff G RobinsonWashington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Peixin ZhangNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Benjamin W CornTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Mei-Yin C Polley · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
Brain Tumor Clinical and Clinical Research Program (Clinical Support Services)ZIDBC011642 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI OZER, BYRAM · 2015 to 2025
$23.4M
Washington University/ Siteman Cancer Center Lead Academic SiteU10CA180833 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, NANCY L, KOZOWER, BENJAMIN D · 2014 to 2018
$7.6M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180833NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We previously reported the unexpected finding of significantly improved survival for newly diagnosed glioblastoma in patients when radiation therapy (RT) was initiated later (>4 wk post-op) compared with earlier (≤2 wk post-op). In that analysis, data were analyzed from 2855 patients from 16 NRG Oncology/Radiotherapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials conducted prior to the era of concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) with RT. We now report on 1395 newly diagnosed glioblastomas from 2 studies, treated with RT and concurrent TMZ followed by adjuvant TMZ. Our hypothesis was that concurrent TMZ has a synergistic/radiosensitizing mechanism, making RT timing less significant. Methods: Data from patients treated with TMZ-based chemoradiation from NRG Oncology/RTOG 0525 and 0825 were analyzed. An analysis comparable to our prior study was performed to determine whether there was still an impact on survival by delaying RT. Overall survival (OS) was investigated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. Early progression (during time of diagnosis to 30 days after RT completion) was analyzed using the chi-square test. Results: Given the small number of patients who started RT early following surgery, comparisons were made between >4 and ≤4 weeks delay of radiation from time of operation. There was no statistically significant difference in OS (hazard ratio = 0.93; P = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.80-1.07) after adjusting for known prognostic factors (recursive partitioning analysis and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation status). Similarly, the rate of early progression did not differ significantly (P = 0.63). Conclusions: We did not observe a significant prognostic influence of delaying radiation when given concurrently with TMZ for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. The effects of early (1-3 wk post-op) or late (>5 wk) initiation of radiation tested in our prior study could not be replicated.

Indexed as

Time-to-TreatmentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisBevacizumabTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID29462493
PMCPMC6007748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.