Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29462204›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Microbial diversity and component variation in Xiaguan Tuo Tea during pile fermentation.

Haizhou Li, Min Li, Xinrui Yang, Xin Gui, Guofeng Chen, Jiuyun Chu, Xingwang He, Weitao Wang, Feng Han, Ping Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Core Role ofIndian journal of microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Haizhou LiResearch Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai East Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2050-6645
Min LiResearch Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai East Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Xinrui YangResearch Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai East Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Xin GuiResearch Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai East Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Guofeng ChenYunnan Xiaguan Tuo Tea (Group) Co., Ltd, Dali, Yunnan, China.
Jiuyun ChuYunnan Xiaguan Tuo Tea (Group) Co., Ltd, Dali, Yunnan, China.
Xingwang HeYunnan Xiaguan Tuo Tea (Group) Co., Ltd, Dali, Yunnan, China.
Weitao WangYunnan Xiaguan Tuo Tea (Group) Co., Ltd, Dali, Yunnan, China.
Feng HanCollege of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Ping LiResearch Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai East Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1417-6360
Shanghai East Hospital · CNYuntianhua Group (China) · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xiaguan Tuo Tea is largely consumed by the Chinese, but there is little research into the microbial diversity and component changes during the fermentation of this tea. In this study, we first used fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), next-generation sequencing (NGS) and chemical analysis methods to determine the microbial abundance and diversity and the chemical composition during fermentation. The FISH results showed that the total number of microorganisms ranges from 2.3×102 to 4.0×108 cells per gram of sample during fermentation and is mainly dominated by fungi. In the early fermentation stages, molds are dominant (0.6×102~2.8×106 cells/g, 0~35 d). However, in the late stages of fermentation, yeasts are dominant (3.6×104~9.6×106 cells/g, 35~56 d). The bacteria have little effect during the fermentation of tea (102~103 cells/g, <1% of fungus values). Of these fungi, A. niger (Aspergillus niger) and B. adeninivorans (Blastobotrys adeninivorans) are identified as the two most common strains, based on Next-generation Sequencing (NGS) analysis. Peak diversity in tea was observed at day 35 of fermentation (Shannon-Weaver index: 1.195857), and lower diversity was observed on days 6 and 56 of fermentation (Shannon-Weaver index 0.860589 and 1.119106, respectively). During the microbial fermentation, compared to the unfermented tea, the tea polyphenol content decreased by 54%, and the caffeine content increased by 59%. Theanine and free amino acid contents were reduced during fermentation by 81.1 and 92.85%, respectively.

Indexed as

FermentationBacteriaChinaColony Count, MicrobialFungiHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceTeaTea

Identifiers

PMID29462204
PMCPMC5819769
OpenAlexW2792742254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.