Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29462200›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A prophylactic multivalent vaccine against different filovirus species is immunogenic and provides protection from lethal infections with Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus species in non-human primates.

Benoit Callendret, Jort Vellinga, Kerstin Wunderlich, Ariane Rodriguez, Robin Steigerwald, Ulrike Dirmeier, Cedric Cheminay, Ariane Volkmann, Trevor Brasel, Ricardo Carrion and 11 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Marburg and Sudan virus outbreaks: are we any closer to a pan-filovirus vaccine?Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Benoit CallendretJanssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Leiden, Netherlands.
Jort VellingaJanssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Leiden, Netherlands.
Kerstin WunderlichJanssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Leiden, Netherlands.
Ariane RodriguezJanssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Leiden, Netherlands.
Robin SteigerwaldBavarian Nordic GmbH, Martinsried, Germany.
Ulrike DirmeierBavarian Nordic GmbH, Martinsried, Germany.
Cedric CheminayBavarian Nordic GmbH, Martinsried, Germany.
Ariane VolkmannBavarian Nordic GmbH, Martinsried, Germany.
Trevor BraselUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Ricardo CarrionDepartment of Virology and Immunology, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.
Luis D GiavedoniDepartment of Virology and Immunology, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.
Jean L PattersonDepartment of Virology and Immunology, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.
Chad E MireUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Thomas W GeisbertUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Jay W HooperVirology Division, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland, United States of America.
Mo WeijtensJanssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Leiden, Netherlands.
Jutta Hartkoorn-PasmaJanssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Leiden, Netherlands.
Jerome CustersJanssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Leiden, Netherlands.
Maria Grazia PauJanssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Leiden, Netherlands.
Hanneke SchuitemakerJanssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Leiden, Netherlands.
Roland ZahnJanssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2822-6231
Janssen (Netherlands) · NLBavarian Nordic (Germany) · DETexas Biomedical Research Institute · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USUnited States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

The Southwest National Primate Research Center Supplement- Infrastructure improvements of ABSL2 holding areasP51OD011133 · OD · TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Larry S. Schlesinger · 2012 to 2026
$129.7M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200800056CNIH HHS P51 OD011133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for a universal filovirus vaccine that provides protection against multiple filovirus species has been prompted by sporadic but highly lethal outbreaks of Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus infections. A good prophylactic vaccine should be able to provide protection to all known filovirus species and as an upside potentially protect from newly emerging virus strains. We investigated the immunogenicity and protection elicited by multivalent vaccines expressing glycoproteins (GP) from Ebola virus (EBOV), Sudan virus (SUDV), Taï Forest virus (TAFV) and Marburg virus (MARV). Immune responses against filovirus GP have been associated with protection from disease. The GP antigens were expressed by adenovirus serotypes 26 and 35 (Ad26 and Ad35) and modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) vectors, all selected for their strong immunogenicity and good safety profile. Using fully lethal NHP intramuscular challenge models, we assessed different vaccination regimens for immunogenicity and protection from filovirus disease. Heterologous multivalent Ad26-Ad35 prime-boost vaccination regimens could give full protection against MARV (range 75%-100% protection) and EBOV (range 50% to 100%) challenge, and partial protection (75%) against SUDV challenge. Heterologous multivalent Ad26-MVA prime-boost immunization gave full protection against EBOV challenge in a small cohort study. The use of such multivalent vaccines did not show overt immune interference in comparison with monovalent vaccines. Multivalent vaccines induced GP-specific antibody responses and cellular IFNγ responses to each GP expressed by the vaccine, and cross-reactivity to TAFV GP was detected in a trivalent vaccine expressing GP from EBOV, SUDV and MARV. In the EBOV challenge studies, higher humoral EBOV GP-specific immune responses (p = 0.0004) were associated with survival from EBOV challenge and less so for cellular immune responses (p = 0.0320). These results demonstrate that it is feasible to generate a multivalent filovirus vaccine that can protect against lethal infection by multiple members of the filovirus family.

Indexed as

AnimalsEbolavirusFemaleHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaMacaca fascicularisMaleMarburgvirusMarburg Virus DiseaseViral VaccinesViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID29462200
PMCPMC5819775
OpenAlexW2731692079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.