Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29462153›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2018

Design of synthetic bacterial communities for predictable plant phenotypes.

Sur Herrera Paredes, Tianxiang Gao, Theresa F Law, Omri M Finkel, Tatiana Mucyn, Paulo José Pereira Lima Teixeira, Isaí Salas González, Meghan E Feltcher, Matthew J Powers, Elizabeth A Shank and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Microbial biotechnology meets ecological theory: a unified framework to design industrial microbial consortia.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sur Herrera ParedesDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Tianxiang GaoDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Theresa F LawDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Omri M FinkelDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Tatiana MucynDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Paulo José Pereira Lima TeixeiraDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Isaí Salas GonzálezDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Meghan E FeltcherDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Matthew J PowersDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Elizabeth A ShankDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Corbin D JonesDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Vladimir JojicDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jeffery L DanglDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Gabriel CastrilloDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

UNC Predoc Training Progr in Bioinformatics/Comp BiologyT32GM067553 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELSTON, TIMOTHY C · 2005 to 2019
$2.5M
Designing robust synthetic microbiota for increasing plant productivityF32GM117758 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FINKEL, OMRI M · 2016 to 2017
$115k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM117758NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM067553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specific members of complex microbiota can influence host phenotypes, depending on both the abiotic environment and the presence of other microorganisms. Therefore, it is challenging to define bacterial combinations that have predictable host phenotypic outputs. We demonstrate that plant-bacterium binary-association assays inform the design of small synthetic communities with predictable phenotypes in the host. Specifically, we constructed synthetic communities that modified phosphate accumulation in the shoot and induced phosphate starvation-responsive genes in a predictable fashion. We found that bacterial colonization of the plant is not a predictor of the plant phenotypes we analyzed. Finally, we demonstrated that characterizing a subset of all possible bacterial synthetic communities is sufficient to predict the outcome of untested bacterial consortia. Our results demonstrate that it is possible to infer causal relationships between microbiota membership and host phenotypes and to use these inferences to rationally design novel communities.

Indexed as

Host Microbial InteractionsMicrobial ConsortiaBacteriaBrassicaceaeGenes, BacterialGenes, PlantPhosphatesPlant RootsPlant ShootsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSymbiosisPhosphatesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID29462153
PMCPMC5819758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.