Trial reportAnnals of surgery2018
Oncological Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Gemcitabine Versus Upfront Surgery in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Phase 2/3 Trial.
Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 347 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Chemotherapy-based Split Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Study Protocol of a Prospective, Single-arm Phase II Trial
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: An Multicenter Open-label Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
347 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 671 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Upfront Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Journal of surgical research · 2025Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant treatment versus upfront surgery in borderline resectable and resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: meta-analysis.BJS open · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Comparison of the upfront surgery and neoadjuvant therapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Updates in surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of metal versus plastic stent for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Pooled it
- FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine-based Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Multi-institutional, Patient-Level, Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison the efficacy and safety of different neoadjuvant regimens for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Mesenteric Versus Conventional Approach During Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (MAPLE-PD trial): A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.Annals of surgery · 2026Trial
- Treatment of initially unresectable local advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma with FOLFIRINOX: A prospective study YCOG1403 (C-FLAP study).Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Perioperative therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an Academic Gastrointestinal Cancer Consortium Study.The oncologist · 2025Trial
- Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance Analysis of Alliance A021501: Preoperative mFOLFIRINOX or mFOLFIRINOX Plus Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Borderline Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2024Trial
- Results of a Randomized Clinical Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1 as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (RCT, CSGO-HBP-015).Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Trial
- Adjuvant Gemcitabine Versus Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant FOLFIRINOX in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: The Randomized Multicenter Phase II NEPAFOX Trial.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Trial
- Long-term outcomes of standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A Chinese multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial.Journal of advanced research · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Upfront surgery vs. neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer with venous involvement: a multicenter retrospective analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Observational
- Practical Considerations in the Radiotherapy Treatment Planning for SBRT Pancreas Program.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- ASO Author Reflections: It is Time to Define an Optimal Duration of Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
287 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was performed to determine whether neoadjuvant treatment increases survival in patients with BRPC. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Despite many promising retrospective data on the effect of neoadjuvant treatment for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC), no high-level evidence exists to support the role of such treatment.
methodsThis phase 2/3 multicenter randomized controlled trial was designed to enroll 110 patients with BRPC who were randomly assigned to gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment (54 Gray external beam radiation) followed by surgery or upfront surgery followed by chemoradiation treatment from four large-volume centers in Korea. The primary endpoint was the 2-year survival rate (2-YSR). Interim analysis was planned at the time of 50% case enrollment.
resultsAfter excluding the patients who withdrew consent (n = 8) from the 58 enrolled patients, 27 patients were allocated to neoadjuvant treatment and 23 to upfront surgery groups. The overall 2-YSR was 34.0% with a median survival of 16 months. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the 2-YSR and median survival were significantly better in the neoadjuvant chemoradiation than the upfront surgery group [40.7%, 21 months vs 26.1%, 12 months, hazard ratio 1.495 (95% confidence interval 0.66-3.36), P = 0.028]. R0 resection rate was also significantly higher in the neoadjuvant chemoradiation group than upfront surgery (n = 14, 51.8% vs n = 6, 26.1%, P = 0.004). The safety monitoring committee decided on early termination of the study on the basis of the statistical significance of neoadjuvant treatment efficacy.
conclusionThis is the first prospective randomized controlled trial on the oncological benefits of neoadjuvant treatment in BRPC. Compared to upfront surgery, neoadjuvant chemoradiation provides oncological benefits in patients with BRPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.