Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29461334›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient safety2020

A Patient Safety Toolkit for Family Practices.

Stephen M Campbell, Brian G Bell, Kate Marsden, Rachel Spencer, Umesh Kadam, Katherine Perryman, Sarah Rodgers, Ian Litchfield, David Reeves, Antony Chuter and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Developing a patient safety guide for primary care: A co-design approach involving patients, carers and clinicians.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen M Campbell
Brian G BellDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham.
Kate MarsdenDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham.
Rachel SpencerDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham.
Umesh KadamHealth Services Research Unit, Guy Hilton Research Centre, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent.
Katherine PerrymanFrom the NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester.
Sarah RodgersDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham.
Ian LitchfieldInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
David ReevesCentre for Primary Care, Division of Population Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Antony Chuter68 Brighton Cottages, Copyhold Lane, Lindfield, Haywards Heath, West Sussex.
Lucy DoosInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
Ignacio Ricci-CabelloNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford.
Paramjit GillInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
Aneez EsmailCentre for Primary Care, Division of Population Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Sheila GreenfieldInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
Sarah SlightNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford.
Karen MiddletonPrimary Medical Care, University of Southampton.
Jane BarnettPrimary Medical Care, University of Southampton.
Michael MoorePrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton.
Jose M ValderasHealth Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter.
Aziz SheikhMedical School, Teviot Place, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Anthony J Avery
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBNIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GBKeele University · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMajor gaps remain in our understanding of primary care patient safety. We describe a toolkit for measuring patient safety in family practices.

methodsSix tools were used in 46 practices. These tools were as follows: National Health Service Education for Scotland Trigger Tool, National Health Service Education for Scotland Medicines Reconciliation Tool, Primary Care Safequest, Prescribing Safety Indicators, Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care, and Concise Safe Systems Checklist.

resultsPrimary Care Safequest showed that most practices had a well-developed safety climate. However, the trigger tool revealed that a quarter of events identified were associated with moderate or substantial harm, with a third originating in primary care and avoidable. Although medicines reconciliation was undertaken within 2 days in more than 70% of cases, necessary discussions with a patient/carer did not always occur. The prescribing safety indicators identified 1435 instances of potentially hazardous prescribing or lack of recommended monitoring (from 92,649 patients). The Concise Safe Systems Checklist found that 25% of staff thought that their practice provided inadequate follow-up for vulnerable patients discharged from hospital and inadequate monitoring of noncollection of prescriptions. Most patients had a positive perception of the safety of their practice although 45% identified at least one safety problem in the past year.

conclusionsPatient safety is complex and multidimensional. The Patient Safety Toolkit is easy to use and hosted on a single platform with a collection of tools generating practical and actionable information. It enables family practices to identify safety deficits that they can review and change procedures to improve their patient safety across a key sets of patient safety issues.

Indexed as

Family PracticeFemaleHumansMalePatient SafetyPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID29461334
PMCPMC7447126
OpenAlexW2776422811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.