Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29460393›Full record

ArticleBirth defects research2018

Embryo-fetal development studies with the dietary supplement vinpocetine in the rat and rabbit.

Natasha Catlin, Suramya Waidyanatha, Eve Mylchreest, Lutfiya Miller-Pinsler, Helen Cunny, Paul Foster, Vicki Sutherland, Barry McIntyre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth defects research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Effect of vinpocetine on embryonic heart rateCurrent research in toxicology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha CatlinDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-8100-0701
Suramya WaidyanathaDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Eve MylchreestSouthern Research Institute, Birmingham, Alabama.
Lutfiya Miller-PinslerSouthern Research Institute, Birmingham, Alabama.
Helen CunnyDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Paul FosterDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Vicki SutherlandDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Barry McIntyreDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USSouthern Research Institute · US

Funding

Toxicological Assessments for the National Toxicology ProgramZIAES103316 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WALKER, NIGEL J · 2016 to 2019
$31.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS HHSN273201300010CNIEHS NIH HHS HHSN273201300010INIEHS NIH HHS HHSN273201400027C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary supplement and natural product use is increasing within the United States, resulting in growing concern for exposure in vulnerable populations, including young adults and women of child-bearing potential. Vinpocetine is a semisynthetic derivative of the Vinca minor extract, vincamine. Human exposure to vinpocetine occurs through its use as a dietary supplement for its purported nootropic and neuroprotective effects. To investigate the effects of vinpocetine on embryo-fetal development, groups of 25 pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats and 8 pregnant New Zealand White rabbits were orally administered 0, 5, 20, or 60 mg vinpocetine/kg and 0, 25, 75, 150, or 300 mg/kg daily from gestational day (GD) 6-20 and GD 7-28, respectively. Pregnant rats dosed with vinpocetine demonstrated dose-dependent increases in postimplantation loss, higher frequency of early and total resorptions, lower fetal body weights, and fewer live fetuses following administration of 60 mg/kg, in the absence of maternal toxicity. Additionally, the rat fetuses displayed dose-dependent increases in the incidences of ventricular septum defects and full supernumerary thoracolumbar ribs. Similarly, albeit at higher doses than the rats, pregnant rabbits administered vinpocetine displayed an increase in postimplantation loss and fewer live fetuses (300 mg/kg), in addition to significantly lower fetal body weights (≥75 mg/kg). In conclusion, vinpocetine exposure resulted in similar effects on embryo-fetal development in the rat and rabbit. The species differences in sensitivity and magnitude of response is likely attributable to a species difference in metabolism. Taken together, these data suggest a potential hazard for pregnant women who may be taking vinpocetine.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, Drug-InducedAnimalsDietary SupplementsEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleFetal DevelopmentFetal WeightFetusMaternal ExposurePregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsRabbitsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyVinca AlkaloidsVinca Alkaloidsvinpocetinedietary supplementsembryo-fetal developmentembryotoxicityfetal malformationsrabbitratvinpocetine

Identifiers

PMID29460393
PMCPMC5980693
OpenAlexW2790751758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.