Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29460202›Full record

ArticlePituitary2018

Clinicopathological significance of baseline T2-weighted signal intensity in functional pituitary adenomas.

Sema Ciftci Dogansen, Gulsah Yenidunya Yalin, Seher Tanrikulu, Sakin Tekin, Nihan Nizam, Bilge Bilgic, Serra Sencer, Sema Yarman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Acromegaly: diagnostic challenges and individualized treatment.Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Multidisciplinary management of acromegaly: A consensus.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sema Ciftci DogansenDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Capa, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34090, Istanbul, Turkey. sdogansen@gmail.com.
Gulsah Yenidunya YalinDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Capa, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34090, Istanbul, Turkey.
Seher TanrikuluDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Capa, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34090, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sakin TekinDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Capa, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34090, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nihan NizamDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Capa, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34090, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bilge BilgicDepartment of Pathology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serra SencerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sema YarmanDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Capa, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34090, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess baseline T2-weighted signal intensity (T2-WSI) of functional pituitary adenomas (FPA), and to investigate the relationship of baseline T2-WSI with clinical features, histopathological granulation patterns, and response to treatment in patients with acromegaly, prolactinoma and Cushing's disease (CD).

methodsSomatotroph adenomas (n = 87), prolactinomas (n = 78) and corticotroph adenomas (n = 29) were included in the study. Baseline T2-WSI findings (grouped as hypo-, iso- and hyperintense) were compared with hormone levels, tumor diameter, granulation patterns and response to treatment.

resultsSomatotroph adenomas were mostly hypointense (53%), prolactinomas were dominantly hyperintense (55%), and corticotroph adenomas were generally hyperintense (45%). Hyperintense somatotroph adenomas were larger in size with sparsely granulated pattern and tumor shrinkage rate was lower after somatostatin analogues (SSA) (p = 0.007, p = 0.035, p = 0.029, respectively). T2 hypointensity was related with higher baseline IGF-1% ULN (upper limit of normal) levels and a better response to SSA treatment (p = 0.02, p = 0.045, respectively). In female prolactinomas, hyperintensity was correlated with a smaller adenoma diameter (p = 0.001). Hypointense female prolactinomas were related to younger age at diagnosis, higher baseline PRL levels and dopamine agonist (DA) resistance (p = 0.009, p = 0.022, p < 0.001, respectively). Hyperintense corticotroph adenomas were related to larger adenoma size and sparsely granulated pattern (p = 0.04, p = 0.017, respectively). There was no significant difference in the recurrence with T2WSI in CD.

conclusionBaseline hypointense somatotroph adenomas show a better response to SSA, whereas hypointensity was related to DA resistance in female prolactinomas.

Indexed as

AcromegalyAdenomaAdultDopamine AgonistsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGrowth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary AdenomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPituitary ACTH HypersecretionPituitary NeoplasmsProlactinomaRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsDopamine AgonistsSomatostatinCorticotroph adenomaDopamine agonist resistanceGranulation patternProlactinomaSomatotroph adenomaT2-weighted signal intensity

Identifiers

PMID29460202
OpenAlexW2791644915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.