ArticleEJNMMI physics2018
Quantitative analysis of phantom studies of
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fibroblast activation protein targeting radiopharmaceuticals: From drug design to clinical translation.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- EANM guidance document: dosimetry for first-in-human studies and early phase clinical trials.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Evaluation of reconstruction methods and image noise levels concerning visual assessment of simulated liver lesions inEJNMMI physics · 2023Article
- Relationships between uptake of [EJNMMI research · 2022Article
- Correction to: Quantitative analysis of phantom studies ofEJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Development of a new quantification method using partial volume effect correction for individual energy peaks inAsia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2022Article
- EVALUATION OF THE SPATIAL RESOLUTION IN MONTE CARLO-BASED SPECT/CT RECONSTRUCTION OF 111IN-OCTREOTIDE IMAGES.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2021Article
- Standardisation of conventional and advanced iterative reconstruction methods for Gallium-68 multi-centre PET-CT trials.EJNMMI physics · 2021Article
- Optimization of injectedEJNMMI physics · 2020Article
- Multicentre quantitativeEJNMMI physics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNuclear medicine imaging of neuroendocrine tumours is performed either by SPECT/CT imaging, using
resultsThe 10-mm sphere was not possible to detect in SPECT images. It was detectable in PET images for SBRs of 2.5:1 and higher. In a background corresponding to the activity uptake in the liver, spheres larger than 22-37 mm were detectable in the
conclusionsIt was not possible to detect the 10-mm sphere in any of the SPECT images. In a background corresponding to the activity uptake in the liver, spheres larger than approximately 30 mm were visible in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.