ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2018
Influences of environmental factors on macroinvertebrate assemblages: differences between mountain and lowland ecoregions, Wei River, China.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of environmental variables on macroinvertebrate community structure in Lianhuan Lake.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- The determinant factors for macroinvertebrate assemblages in a recreational river in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2021Article
- The role of hydro-environmental factors in Mayfly (Ephemeroptera, Insecta) community structure: Identifying threshold responses.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Agricultural Land-Use Legacy, The Invasive Alga Didymosphenia geminata and Invertebrate Communities in Upland Streams with Natural Flow Regimes.Environmental management · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Key environmental factors and the mechanisms of their influence on the physicochemical habitats and macroinvertebrate communities of streams may vary among ecoregions. We studied the differences in environmental (land use and physicochemical) factors and the mechanisms of their influence on macroinvertebrate assemblages between mountain and lowland ecoregions in central China. We applied generalized linear models to identify key environmental factors that influence macroinvertebrate metrics consisting of taxa richness, Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (EPT) taxa, percentages of EPT and intolerant individuals, and the Shannon-Wiener diversity index. Environmental factors and macroinvertebrate metrics significantly differed between the ecoregions. Mountain streams had significantly lower nutrients and %silt, but had twice higher total taxa richness than lowland streams. Watershed land uses were key drivers that influenced the physical habitat in the mountain ecoregion and were the main drivers that influenced both physical and chemical conditions in the lowland ecoregion. Correspondingly, watershed scale land uses, as well as physical and chemical variables, explained more variance in macroinvertebrate metrics than local-scale land uses in both mountain and lowland ecoregions. The overall biological variation was explained better by watershed-scale than by reach-scale land uses, whereas the spatial scale over which land use and physicochemical variables influence streams varied across ecoregions. Our results suggest that better landscape planning should be adopted for watershed management to improve water quality and physical habitat, and thus the conservation and restoration of macroinvertebrate biodiversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29460185What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.