Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29460116›Full record

ReviewNanoscale research letters2018

Solid-State Nanopore.

Zhishan Yuan, Chengyong Wang, Xin Yi, Zhonghua Ni, Yunfei Chen, Tie Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanoscale research letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Graphene Nanopore Fabrication and Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. DNA Manipulation and Single-Molecule Imaging.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Fabrication and Applications of Solid-State Nanopores.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhishan YuanSchool of Electromechanical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China. yzshan044@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3630-2532
Chengyong WangSchool of Electromechanical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Xin YiSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Zhonghua NiJiangsu Key Laboratory for Design and Manufacture of Micro-Nano Biomedical Instruments, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, China.
Yunfei ChenJiangsu Key Laboratory for Design and Manufacture of Micro-Nano Biomedical Instruments, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, China.
Tie LiScience and Technology on Microsystem Laboratory, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, China.

Funding

the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2017A030310245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid-state nanopore has captured the attention of many researchers due to its characteristic of nanoscale. Now, different fabrication methods have been reported, which can be summarized into two broad categories: "top-down" etching technology and "bottom-up" shrinkage technology. Ion track etching method, mask etching method chemical solution etching method, and high-energy particle etching and shrinkage method are exhibited in this report. Besides, we also discussed applications of solid-state nanopore fabrication technology in DNA sequencing, protein detection, and energy conversion.

Indexed as

ApplicationsFabricationSolid-state nanopore

Identifiers

PMID29460116
PMCPMC5818388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.