Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29460069›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

Experimental feasibility of spectral photon-counting computed tomography with two contrast agents for the detection of endoleaks following endovascular aortic repair.

Julia Dangelmaier, Daniel Bar-Ness, Heiner Daerr, Daniela Muenzel, Salim Si-Mohamed, Sebastian Ehn, Alexander A Fingerle, Melanie A Kimm, Felix K Kopp, Loic Boussel and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A scoping review of photon-counting detector computed tomography in cardiovascular imaging.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026
    Article
  2. K-Edge imaging using a clinical dual-source photon-counting CT system.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia DangelmaierDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. julia.dangelmaier@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2428-7072
Daniel Bar-NessCREATIS, CNRS UMR 5220, INSERM U1206, INSA, Lyon, France.
Heiner DaerrPhilips GmbH Innovative Technologies, Research Laboratories, Hamburg, Germany.
Daniela MuenzelDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Salim Si-MohamedCREATIS, CNRS UMR 5220, INSERM U1206, INSA, Lyon, France.
Sebastian EhnChair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics and Munich School of BioEngineering, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Alexander A FingerleDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Melanie A KimmDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Felix K KoppDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Loic BousselCREATIS, CNRS UMR 5220, INSERM U1206, INSA, Lyon, France.
Ewald RoesslPhilips GmbH Innovative Technologies, Research Laboratories, Hamburg, Germany.
Franz PfeifferDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Ernst J RummenyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Roland ProksaPhilips GmbH Innovative Technologies, Research Laboratories, Hamburg, Germany.
Philippe DouekCREATIS, CNRS UMR 5220, INSERM U1206, INSA, Lyon, France.
Peter B NoëlDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEPhilips (Germany) · DEUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAfter endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), discrimination of endoleaks and intra-aneurysmatic calcifications within the aneurysm often requires multiphase computed tomography (CT). Spectral photon-counting CT (SPCCT) in combination with a two-contrast agent injection protocol may provide reliable detection of endoleaks with a single CT acquisition.

methodsTo evaluate the feasibility of SPCCT, the stent-lined compartment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm phantom was filled with a mixture of iodine and gadolinium mimicking enhanced blood. To represent endoleaks of different flow rates, the adjacent compartments contained either one of the contrast agents or calcium chloride to mimic intra-aneurysmatic calcifications. After data acquisition with a SPCCT prototype scanner with multi-energy bins, material decomposition was performed to generate iodine, gadolinium and calcium maps.

resultsIn a conventional CT slice, Hounsfield units (HU) of the compartments were similar ranging from 147 to 168 HU. Material-specific maps differentiate the distributions within the compartments filled with iodine, gadolinium or calcium.

conclusionSPCCT may replace multiphase CT to detect endoleaks without sacrificing diagnostic accuracy. It is a unique feature of our method to capture endoleak dynamics and allow reliable distinction from intra-aneurysmatic calcifications in a single scan, thereby enabling a significant reduction of radiation exposure. KEY POINTS: • SPCCT might enable advanced endoleak detection. • Material maps derived from SPCCT can differentiate iodine, gadolinium and calcium. • SPCCT may potentially reduce radiation burden for EVAR patients under post-interventional surveillance.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaPhotonsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalEndoleakEndovascular ProceduresFeasibility StudiesFemaleGadoliniumHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhantoms, ImagingStentsTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaGadoliniumComputed tomographyEndoleakGadoliniumIodinePhoton counting

Identifiers

PMID29460069
PMCPMC6028848
OpenAlexW2790490677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.