ArticleOecologia2018
Hydrodynamics affect predator controls through physical and sensory stressors.
Article in Oecologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Predators influence communities through either consuming prey (consumptive effects, CEs) or altering prey traits (non-consumptive effects, NCEs), which has cascading effects on lower trophic levels. CEs are well known to decrease in physically stressful environments, but NCEs may be reduced at physically benign levels that affect the ability of prey to detect and respond to predators (i.e., sensory stress). We investigated the influence of physical and sensory stressors created by spatial and temporal differences in tidal flow on predator controls in a tritrophic system. We estimated mud crab reactive ranges to blue crab NCEs by evaluating mud crab CEs on juvenile oysters at different distances away from caged blue crabs across flow conditions. Mud crab reactive ranges were large at lower physical and sensory stress levels and blue crabs had a positive cascading effect on oyster survival. Blue crab NCEs were not important at higher flow conditions. Oyster survival was a complicated function of both types of stressors. Physical stress (i.e., current speed) had a positive effect on oyster survival by physically limiting mud crab CEs at high current speeds. Sensory stress (i.e., turbulence) interfered with the propagation of blue crab chemical cues used by mud crabs for predator detection, which removed blue crab NCEs. Mud crab CEs increased as a result and had a negative effect on oyster survival in turbulent conditions. Thus, environmental properties, such as fluid flow, can inflict physical and sensory stressors that have distinct effects on basal prey performance through impacts on different predator effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.