Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29459991›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2018

[Infectious diseases - a specialty of internal medicine].

G Fätkenheuer, N Jung, W V Kern, U R Fölsch, B Salzberger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

G FätkenheuerKlinik I für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. g.faetkenheuer@uni-koeln.de.
N JungKlinik I für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
W V KernAbteilung Infektiologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum und Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
U R FölschKlinik für Innere Medizin I, Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel, Deutschland.
B SalzbergerStabsstelle Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious diseases have recently gained wide public interest. Emerging infections and rising rates of antibiotic resistance are determining this trend. Both challenges will need to be addressed in international and local collaborations between different specialties in medicine and basic science. Infectious diseases as a clinical specialty in this scenario is directly responsible for the care of patients with infectious diseases. Its involvement in the care of patients with complicated infections has proved to be highly effective. Antibiotic stewardship programmes are effective measures in slowing the development of antibiotic resistance and have been widely implemented. But antibiotic stewardship specialists should not be confused with or taken as an alternative to infectious disease experts. Infectious diseases requires appropriate and specific training. It mainly uses the instrumentarium of internal medicine. With the current challenges in modern medicine, infectious diseases in Germany should thus be upgraded from a subspecialty to a clinical specialty, ideally within Internal Medicine.

Indexed as

SpecializationAntimicrobial StewardshipCommunicable Diseases, EmergingCurriculumDrug Resistance, MicrobialEducation, Medical, GraduateGermanyHumansInfectious Disease MedicineInternal MedicineAntibiotic stewardshipDrug resistance, microbialEducation, medical, postgraduateInfectious diseases, emergingSpecialty, internal medicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.