Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29459866›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2018

Current Status of Gene Engineering Cell Therapeutics.

Aurore Saudemont, Laurent Jespers, Timothy Clay

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cellular immunotherapies for cancer.Irish journal of medical science · 2021
    Review
  5. Spatiotemporal PET Imaging Reveals Differences in CAR-T Tumor Retention in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Models.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Non-invasive Reporter Gene Imaging of Cell Therapies, including T Cells and Stem Cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. How Non-invasiveFrontiers in physiology · 2020
    Review
  13. Future prospects for CD8Immunological reviews · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Cousins at work: How combining medical with optical imaging enhances in vivo cell tracking.The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology · 2018
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aurore SaudemontGlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, United Kingdom.
Laurent JespersGlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, United Kingdom.
Timothy ClayGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, United States.
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCell EngineeringClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicCytokine-Induced Killer CellsGenetic EngineeringGenetic TherapyHematologic NeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyKiller Cells, NaturalMiceNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cellallogeneicautologouscell therapyex vivo therapygene therapy

Identifiers

PMID29459866
PMCPMC5807372
OpenAlexW2791800977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.