ReviewNature communications2018
Formalising recall by genotype as an efficient approach to detailed phenotyping and causal inference.
Review in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating the cardiovascular safety of sclerostin inhibition using evidence from meta-analysis of clinical trials and human genetics.Science translational medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Polygenic risk scores in human genetics for study design discovery and translation.Human genetics · 2026Review
- Elucidating the proteomic pathways linking childhood body mass index with type 2 diabetes: a Mendelian randomization and recall-by-genotype study.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- The SINTER study: a recall-by-genotype design with multidimensional musculoskeletal phenotyping across internal-medicine outpatient clinics.European journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Mandibular Cortical Thickness Predicts Skull BMD in Adolescents.Calcified tissue international · 2026Article
- Genetic and epidemiologic assessment of mandibular cortical indices and bone mineral density in peripubertal children: the Generation R study.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Expanding the phenotypic spectrum of PROK2/PROKR2: a recall-by-genotype study.Human genetics · 2025Article
- Precision nutrition for cardiometabolic diseases.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- How to communicate and what to disclose to participants in a recall-by-genotype research approach: a multistep empirical study.Journal of community genetics · 2024Article
- Blood metabolites mediate effects of breakfast skipping on heart failure via Mendelian randomization analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Variability of polygenic prediction for body mass index in Africa.Genome medicine · 2024Article
- Harnessing the power of proteomics in precision diabetes medicine.Diabetologia · 2024Review
- The association between body mass index and metabolite response to a liquid mixed meal challenge: a Mendelian randomization study.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2024Article
- Proof-of-concept recall-by-genotype study of extremely low and high Alzheimer's polygenic risk reveals autobiographical deficits and cingulate cortex correlates.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2023Article
- Participant perspective on the recall-by-genotype research approach: a mixed-method embedded study with participants of the CHRIS study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
- A FinnGen pilot clinical recall study for Alzheimer's disease.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- PNPLA3 rs738409 risk genotype decouples TyG index from HOMA2-IR and intrahepatic lipid content.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2023Article
- Study protocol of the Berlin Research Initiative for Diagnostics, Genetics and Environmental Factors in Schizophrenia (BRIDGE-S).BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Genotype first: Clinical genomics research through a reverse phenotyping approach.American journal of human genetics · 2023Review
- Enhancing Molecular Testing for Effective Delivery of Actionable Gene Diagnostics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detailed phenotyping is required to deepen our understanding of the biological mechanisms behind genetic associations. In addition, the impact of potentially modifiable risk factors on disease requires analytical frameworks that allow causal inference. Here, we discuss the characteristics of Recall-by-Genotype (RbG) as a study design aimed at addressing both these needs. We describe two broad scenarios for the application of RbG: studies using single variants and those using multiple variants. We consider the efficacy and practicality of the RbG approach, provide a catalogue of UK-based resources for such studies and present an online RbG study planner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.