ArticleJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2018
Noninvasive Assessment of Stenotic Severity and Plaque Characteristics by Coronary CT Angiography in Patients Scheduled for Carotid Artery Revascularization.
Article in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography stenosis score for coronary stenosis.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Predicting coronary artery calcified plaques using perivascular fat CT radiomics features and clinical risk factors.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
- Identification of Biomarkers of Autophagy-Related Genes Between Early and Advanced Carotid Atherosclerosis.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- Correlation Between Calcification Characteristics of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque and Plaque Vulnerability.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2021Article
- Comprehensive Assessment of Polyvascular Atherosclerosis.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsCoronary artery atherosclerosis in patients needing carotid revascularization has not been fully clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the stenotic severity and plaque characteristics of coronary arteries by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients scheduled for carotid-artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
methodsWe performed coronary CTA after carotid ultrasound (US) in 164 patients (81.7% male, aged 68.1± 12.2 years) from 2014 to 2016. Of all, 70 were scheduled for CAS or CEA (CAS/CEA group) and 94 were not (non-CAS/CEA group). Carotid US and coronary CTA were compared for the evaluation of stenotic severity and plaque characteristics of each vessel between CAS/CEA and non-CAS/CEA groups.
resultsBetween the two groups, there were significant differences in the presence of significant stenosis (SS: ≥70% stenosis of coronary artery) (55.7% vs. 39.4%, P=0.038), triple-vessel disease (TVD)/left main trunk (LMT) (SS in each of three epicardial vessels and/or LMT) (24.3% vs. 7.5%, P= 0.0025), and high-risk plaque (HRP: positive remodeling and/or low attenuation) (55.7% vs. 24.5%, P＜0.0001). CAS/CEA was independently associated with TVD/LMT (OR=2.30, 95%CI: 1.14-8.59, P=0.026) and HRP (OR=3.17, 95%CI: 1.57-6.54, P=0.0012) in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Similarly, vulnerable plaque (78.6% vs. 2.1%, P＜0.0001) as well as severe stenosis of carotid artery (98.6% vs. 0%, P＜0.0001) was seen more often in CAS/CEA than in non-CAS/CEA group.
conclusionsThe prevalence of TVD/LMT and HRP determined by coronary CTA is higher in patients needing CAS/CEA than in those without. Management of systemic atherosclerosis is required in the perioperative period of CAS/CEA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.