Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29459345›Full record

ArticleCytokine2018

Melanoma exosomes promote mixed M1 and M2 macrophage polarization.

Gina T Bardi, Mary Ann Smith, Joshua L Hood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytokine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Role of itaconate in intestinal disease (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Baicalin RelievesBiomolecules · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gina T BardiUniversity of Louisville, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, & James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Clinical and Translational Research Building, 505 South Hancock Street, Louisville, KY 40202, United States. Electronic address: gina.bardi@louisville.edu.
Mary Ann SmithUniversity of Louisville, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, & James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Clinical and Translational Research Building, 505 South Hancock Street, Louisville, KY 40202, United States. Electronic address: masmith611@aol.com.
Joshua L HoodUniversity of Louisville, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, & James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Clinical and Translational Research Building, 505 South Hancock Street, Louisville, KY 40202, United States. Electronic address: joshua.hood@louisville.edu.

Funding

PILOT PROJECT PROGRAMP30GM106396 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI MILLER, DONALD M. · 2013 to 2017
$5.4M
University of Louisville Cancer Education ProgramR25CA134283 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI HEIN, DAVID W, KIDD, LA CREIS RENEE · 2011 to 2022
$3.1M
Continuous separation of melanoma exosomes using field-flow fractionationR21GM107894 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GALE, BRUCE, HOOD, JOSHUA L. · 2013 to 2015
$575k
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA134283NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM106396NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM107894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages are key participants in melanoma growth and survival. In general, macrophages can be classified as M1 or M2 activation phenotypes. Increasing evidence demonstrates that melanoma exosomes also facilitate tumor survival and metastasis. However, the role of melanoma exosomes in directly influencing macrophage function is poorly understood. Herein, we investigated the hypothesis that natural melanoma exosomes might directly influence macrophage polarization. To explore this hypothesis, ELISA, RT-qPCR, and macrophage functional studies were performed in vitro using an established source of melanoma exosomes (B16-F10). ELISA results for melanoma exosome induction of common M1 and M2 cytokines in RAW 264.7 macrophages, revealed that melanoma exosomes do not polarize macrophages exclusively in the M1 or M2 direction. Melanoma exosomes induced the M1 and M2 representative cytokines TNF-α and IL-10 respectively. Further assessment, using an RT-qPCR array with RAW 264.7 and primary macrophages, confirmed and extended the ELISA findings. Upregulation of markers common to both M1 and M2 polarization phenotypes included CCL22, IL-12B, IL-1β, IL-6, i-NOS, and TNF-α. The M2 cytokine TGF-β was upregulated in primary but not RAW 264.7 macrophages. Pro-tumor functions have been attributed to each of these markers. Macrophage functional assays demonstrated a trend toward increased i-NOS (M1) to arginase (M2) activity. Collectively, the results provide the first evidence that melanoma exosomes can induce a mixed M1 and M2 pro-tumor macrophage activation phenotype.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityAnimalsArginaseBiomarkersExosomesGene Expression RegulationInterleukin-4LipopolysaccharidesMacrophagesMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNitric Oxide Synthase Type IIRAW 264.7 CellsUp-RegulationArginaseBiomarkersInterleukin-4LipopolysaccharidesNitric Oxide Synthase Type IIChemokineCytokineExosomesM1/M2MacrophageMelanomaPolarization

Identifiers

PMID29459345
PMCPMC5857255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.