Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29458966›Full record

ReviewTrends in cancer2018

Have Clinical Trials Properly Assessed c-Met Inhibitors?

Veronica S Hughes, Dietmar W Siemann

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Ovarian Cancer: Therapeutic Strategies to Overcome Immune Suppression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Veronica S HughesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, 2033 Mowry Road, Cancer Genetic Research Complex, Room 485E, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. Electronic address: nikkisaf@ufl.edu.
Dietmar W SiemannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, 2033 Mowry Road, Cancer Genetic Research Complex, Room 485E, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
University of Florida · US

Funding

Hypoxia: Impact on Src Signaling and Prostate CancerR01CA197477 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SIEMANN, DIETMAR W · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The c-Met/HGF pathway is implicated in cancer progression and dissemination. Many inhibitors have been developed to target this pathway. Unfortunately, most trials have failed to demonstrate efficacy. However, clinical trials have not adequately tested the concept of c-Met pathway inhibition due to the lack of appropriate patient selection criteria.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorClinical Trials as TopicHumansNeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorMET protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metcancerclinical trialsc-Metinhibitor

Identifiers

PMID29458966
PMCPMC5824436
OpenAlexW2776962480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.