Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29458416›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2018

Cholera diagnosis in human stool and detection in water: protocol for a systematic review of available technologies.

Karin Diaconu, Jennifer Falconer, Fiona O'May, Miguel Jimenez, Joe Matragrano, Betty Njanpop-Lafourcade, Alastair Ager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karin DiaconuInstitute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University - Edinburgh, Musselburgh, EH21 6UU, Scotland. kdiaconu@qmu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5810-9725
Jennifer FalconerInstitute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University - Edinburgh, Musselburgh, EH21 6UU, Scotland.
Fiona O'MayInstitute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University - Edinburgh, Musselburgh, EH21 6UU, Scotland.
Miguel JimenezKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Joe MatragranoColumbia University, 116th St & Broadway, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Betty Njanpop-LafourcadeAgence de Médecine Préventive, 21 boulevard Pasteur, 75015, Paris, France.
Alastair AgerInstitute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University - Edinburgh, Musselburgh, EH21 6UU, Scotland.

Funding

A Household Yeast Biosensor for CholeraR01AI110794 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI CORNISH, VIRGINIA W · 2015 to 2019
$3.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI110794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholera is a highly infectious diarrheal disease spread via fecal contamination of water and food sources; it is endemic in parts of Africa and Asia and recent outbreaks have been reported in Haiti, the Zambia and Democratic Republic of the Congo. If left untreated, the disease can be fatal in less than 24 h and result in case fatality ratios of 30-50%. Cholera disproportionately affects those living in areas with poor access to water and sanitation: the long-term public health response is focused on improving water and hygiene facilities and access. Short-term measures for infection prevention and control, and disease characterization and surveillance, are impaired by diagnostic delays: culture methods are slow and rely on the availability of infrastructure and specialist equipment. Rapid diagnostic tests have shown promise under field conditions and further innovations in this area have been proposed.

methodsThis paper is the protocol for a systematic review focused on identifying current technologies and methods used for cholera diagnosis in stool, and detection in water. We will synthesize and appraise information on product technical specifications, accuracy and design features in order to inform infection prevention and control and innovation development. Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Proquest, IndMed and the WHO and Campbell libraries will be searched. We will include studies reporting on field evaluations, including within-study comparisons against a reference standard, and laboratory evaluations reporting on product validation against field stool or water samples. We will extract data according to protocol and attempt meta-analyses if appropriate given data availability and quality. DISCUSSION: The systematic review builds on a previous scoping review in this field and expands upon this by synthesising data on both product technical characteristics and design features. The review will be of particular value to stakeholders engaged in diagnostic procurement and manufacturers interested in developing cholera or diarrheal disease diagnostics. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016048428 .

Indexed as

Water SupplyCholeraDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDisease OutbreaksFecesGlobal HealthHumansHygienePublic HealthSystematic Reviews as TopicWater MicrobiologyCholeraCholera infection prevention and controlCholera surveillanceDiagnosisDiagnostic productMedical deviceTechnology

Identifiers

PMID29458416
PMCPMC5819268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.