Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29458400›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

Towards an appropriate framework to facilitate responsible inclusion of pregnant women in drug development programs.

Kit C B Roes, Indira S E van der Zande, Maarten van Smeden, Rieke van der Graaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Obstetric Pharmacoethics: An ethical framework for obstetric pharmacology.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kit C B RoesDepartment of Biostatistics and Research Support, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Indira S E van der ZandeDepartment of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands. i.s.e.vanderzande@umcutrecht.nl.
Maarten van SmedenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rieke van der GraafDepartment of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 113105003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based treatment for pregnant women will ultimately require research conducted in the population of pregnant women. Currently, few scholars have addressed the issue of responsible inclusion of pregnant women in drug research. Because of additional risks associated with including pregnant women in drug research and the altered ways in which drugs are processed by the pregnant body, pregnant women cannot be treated as an ordinary subgroup in the various phases of drug development. Instead, responsible inclusion of pregnant women requires careful design and planning of research for pregnant women specifically. Knowledge about these aspects is virtually nonexistent. In this article, we present a practical framework for the responsible inclusion of pregnant women in drug development. We suggest that the framework consists of using a question-based approach with five key questions in combination with three prerequisites which should be addressed when considering inclusion of pregnant women in drug research. The five questions are: A. Can we consider the drug safe (enough) for first exposure in pregnant women and fetuses? B. In which dose range (potentially depending on gestational age) can the drug be considered to remain safe in pregnant women? C. At what dose (regimen, within the range considered safe) can we expect efficacy in pregnant women? D. Can efficacy be confirmed at the target dose, either similar to the initial population or different? E. Can clinical safety be confirmed at a sufficiently acceptable level at the target dose for pregnant women and fetuses, so as to conclude a positive benefit-risk ratio? Combining questions and prerequisites leads to a scheme for appropriate timing of responsible inclusion of pregnant women in drug research. Accordingly, we explore several research design options for including pregnant women in drug trials that are feasible within the framework. Ultimately, the framework may lead to (i) earlier inclusion of pregnant women in drug development, (ii) ensuring that key prerequisites, such as proper dosing, are addressed before more substantial numbers of pregnant women are included in trials, and (iii) optimal use of safety and efficacy data from the initial (nonpregnant) population throughout the drug development process.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentResearch DesignClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicClinical Trials, Phase IV as TopicFemaleFetusHumansPregnancyAdaptive designDrug developmentMethodologyPregnant womenResearch designResearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID29458400
PMCPMC5819166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.