ArticleBMC palliative care2018
The contribution of a MOOC to community discussions around death and dying.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Key themes and approaches in palliative and end-of-life care education for the general public: a systematic review.BMC palliative care · 2025Pooled it
- Illness Experiences in Young and Middle-Aged Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy on Chinese Social Media: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Exploring death literacy with allied health professionals: A cross-sectional survey in Australia.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Death anxiety and death literacy among Turkish patients with chronic diseases: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- The multidimensional orientation toward dying and death inventory: cross-cultural translation and validated in Mainland China participants.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Enhancing the efficacy of healthcare information websites: a case for the development of a best practice framework.BMJ open · 2024Review
- Barriers and drivers of public engagement in palliative care, Scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- Community-based death preparation and education: A scoping review.Death studies · 2023Article
- Educational innovation as a communication strategy in palliative care: A study protocol and preliminary results.PloS one · 2023Article
- Massive Open Online Courses for Health Worker Education in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Collaborative Filtering Recommendation of Music MOOC Resources Based on Spark Architecture.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Educating the masses to address a global public health priority: The Preventing Dementia Massive Open Online Course (MOOC).PloS one · 2022Article
- Evaluating Course Completion, Appropriateness, and Burden in the Understanding Multiple Sclerosis Massive Open Online Course: Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Benefits of Structured Engagement with Target Audiences of a Health Website: Study Design for a Multi-Case Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Words describing feelings about death: A comparison of sentiment for self and others and changes over time.PloS one · 2021Article
- Equipping Learners to Evaluate Online Health Care Resources: Longitudinal Study of Learning Design Strategies in a Health Care Massive Open Online Course.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Application of PBL Mode in a Resident-Focused Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography Training Program: A Perspective of MOOC Environment.Advances in medical education and practice · 2020Article
- Community Views on 'What I Want 'Before I Die'.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in medicine have helped many to live longer lives and to be able to meet health challenges. However death rates are anticipated to increase given the ageing population and chronic disease progression. Being able to talk about death is seen to be important in normalising death as part of life and supporting preparedness for death. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) provide opportunities for the community to engage in collaborative learning. A 5 week MOOC was developed covering four main topics (language and humour, representations of death, medicalisation of dying, and digital dying) aiming: To enable participants to openly and supportively discuss and learn about issues around living, death and dying, To explore the normally unheard opinions and views of Australians around death and dying, and To determine what effect online learning and discussions offered through the MOOC had on participants' feelings and attitudes towards death and dying.
methodsData was captured on engagement rates in the various MOOC activities. Death Attitudes were measured by five items representing the MOOC's learning objectives and completed at enrolment and conclusion. MOOC Satisfaction was measured with six items at the end of the MOOC. Descriptive statistics were produced for each variable and Chi-Square Tests of Independence assessed the extent of the relationship between categorical variables. Socio-demographic variables were examined as predictors of the outcome variables of MOOC engagement, MOOC satisfaction, and death attitudes. Ethical approval was received from Flinders University Social and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee (Project No. 7247).
resultsOne thousand one hundred fifty six people enrolled in the Dying2Learn MOOC with 895 participating in some way. Enrolees were primarily female (92.1%). Age ranged from 16 to 84 (mean = 49.5, SD = 12.3). MOOC satisfaction scores were high. Responses to the experience of participating in the MOOC were very positive, with mean scores ranging from 4.3 to 4.6 (aligning with agreement and strong agreement to statements on the value of participating). Death Attitudes were positive at commencement but increased significantly following participation.
conclusionsThe Dying2Learn MOOC provided an environment that enabled open and supportive discussion around death and dying and influenced attitudinal change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.