Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29458346›Full record

SynthesisBMC endocrine disorders2018

Associations between ERα/β gene polymorphisms and osteoporosis susceptibility and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Heping Zhu, Jiannong Jiang, Qiang Wang, Jun Zong, Liang Zhang, Tieliang Ma, Youjia Xu, Leiyan Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC endocrine disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Heping ZhuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, 214200, China.
Jiannong JiangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, 214200, China.
Qiang WangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, 214200, China.
Jun ZongDepartment of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, 214200, China.
Liang ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, 225001, China.
Tieliang MaCentral Laboratory, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, 214200, China.
Youjia XuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215004, China. xuyoujia@suda.edu.cn.
Leiyan ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, 214200, China. 2004zhp-pp@sohu.com.
Yixing People's Hospital · CNSoochow University · CNJiangsu University · CNNorthern Jiangsu People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany studies have reported associations between estrogen receptor (ER) gene polymorphisms and postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) risk and bone mineral density (BMD), but the results are controversial. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to verify the association between ERα and ERβ gene polymorphisms and osteoporosis susceptibility and BMD in postmenopausal women.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and China WeiPu Library were searched. OR and WMD with 95% CI were calculated to assess the association.

resultsOverall, no significant association was observed between ERα XbaI, ERα PvuII and PMOP susceptibility in either overall, Caucasian or Asian populations. ERα G2014A was significantly associated with a decreased risk of PMOP in Caucasian populations. There was a significant association between ERβ RsaI and PMOP risk in both overall and Asian populations. Caucasian PMOP women with ERα XbaI XX and Xx genotypes had a higher LS Z value than women with xx genotype. ERα XbaI XX genotype was associated with increased FN BMD in overall and Caucasian populations, an increased FN Z value in Asians, and a decreased FN Z value in Caucasians. There was also a significant association between ERα XbaI Xx genotype and an increased FN Z value in either Asians or Caucasians. ERα PvuII PP genotype was associated with a low LS Z value in Caucasians and a low FN BMD and Z value in Asians. Pp genotype in PMOP women was significantly correlated with low LS BMD in overall populations, a low FN Z value in either overall, Caucasian or Asian populations.

conclusionEach ERα and ERβ gene polymorphism might have different impact on PMOP risk and BMD in various ethnicities.

Indexed as

Bone DensityGenetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, GeneticEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor betaFemaleGenotypeHumansOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor betaEstrogen receptorGene polymorphismMeta-analysisPostmenopausal osteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID29458346
PMCPMC5819169
OpenAlexW2797942767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.