Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29457791›Full record

ArticleNature methods2018

Quantitative mapping and minimization of super-resolution optical imaging artifacts.

Siân Culley, David Albrecht, Caron Jacobs, Pedro Matos Pereira, Christophe Leterrier, Jason Mercer, Ricardo Henriques

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 169 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
169citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

169 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

109 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Siân CulleyMRC-Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, UK.
David AlbrechtMRC-Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, UK.
Caron JacobsMRC-Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, UK.
Pedro Matos PereiraMRC-Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1426-9540
Christophe LeterrierAix Marseille Université, CNRS, INP UMR7051, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2957-2032
Jason MercerMRC-Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, UK.
Ricardo HenriquesMRC-Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2043-5234

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M022374/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12018/7Medical Research Council MR/K015826/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Super-resolution microscopy depends on steps that can contribute to the formation of image artifacts, leading to misinterpretation of biological information. We present NanoJ-SQUIRREL, an ImageJ-based analytical approach that provides quantitative assessment of super-resolution image quality. By comparing diffraction-limited images and super-resolution equivalents of the same acquisition volume, this approach generates a quantitative map of super-resolution defects and can guide researchers in optimizing imaging parameters.

Indexed as

ArtifactsAlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOptical Imaging

Identifiers

PMID29457791
PMCPMC5884429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.