Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29457587›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2018

Power cavitation-guided blood-brain barrier opening with focused ultrasound and microbubbles.

M T Burgess, I Apostolakis, E E Konofagou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Characterization of microbubble cavitation in theranostic ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening for gene delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M T BurgessDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
I ApostolakisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
E E KonofagouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Columbia University · US

Funding

Assessment of Ultrsound-facilitated Neurotherapeutics in Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG038961 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI KONOFAGOU, ELISA E. · 2011 to 2020
$5.1M
Optimization of ultrasound-facilitated blood-brain barrier openingR01EB009041 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI KONOFAGOU, ELISA E. · 2008 to 2017
$4.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG038961NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image-guided monitoring of microbubble-based focused ultrasound (FUS) therapies relies on the accurate localization of FUS-stimulated microbubble activity (i.e. acoustic cavitation). Passive cavitation imaging with ultrasound arrays can achieve this, but with insufficient spatial resolution. In this study, we address this limitation and perform high-resolution monitoring of acoustic cavitation-mediated blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening with a new technique called power cavitation imaging. By synchronizing the FUS transmit and passive receive acquisition, high-resolution passive cavitation imaging was achieved by using delay and sum beamforming with absolute time delays. Since the axial image resolution is now dependent on the duration of the received acoustic cavitation emission, short pulses of FUS were used to limit its duration. Image sets were acquired at high-frame rates for calculation of power cavitation images analogous to power Doppler imaging. Power cavitation imaging displays the mean intensity of acoustic cavitation over time and was correlated with areas of acoustic cavitation-induced BBB opening. Power cavitation-guided BBB opening with FUS could constitute a standalone system that may not require MRI guidance during the procedure. The same technique can be used for other acoustic cavitation-based FUS therapies, for both safety and guidance.

Indexed as

AcousticsMicrobubblesAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierFemaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID29457587
PMCPMC5881390
OpenAlexW2792811123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.