Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29457474›Full record

ArticleAssessment2020

The Importance of Calibration in Clinical Psychology.

Oliver Lindhiem, Isaac T Petersen, Lucas K Mentch, Eric A Youngstrom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Assessment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oliver LindhiemUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Isaac T PetersenUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3072-6673
Lucas K MentchUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Eric A YoungstromUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

Assessment of Juvenille Bipolar Spectrum DisordersR01MH066647 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI YOUNGSTROM, ERIC · 2003 to 2007
$2.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accuracy has several elements, not all of which have received equal attention in the field of clinical psychology. Calibration, the degree to which a probabilistic estimate of an event reflects the true underlying probability of the event, has largely been neglected in the field of clinical psychology in favor of other components of accuracy such as discrimination (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve). Although it is frequently overlooked, calibration is a critical component of accuracy with particular relevance for prognostic models and risk-assessment tools. With advances in personalized medicine and the increasing use of probabilistic (0% to 100%) estimates and predictions in mental health research, the need for careful attention to calibration has become increasingly important.

Indexed as

Psychology, ClinicalCalibrationHumansProbabilityPrognosisROC Curveaccuracybiascalibrationconfidenceforecastingpredictionrisk-assessment

Identifiers

PMID29457474
PMCPMC6778000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.