Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29457381›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2018

A Multicenter Study of the Validity and Reliability of Responses to Hand Cold Challenge as Measured by Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging and Thermography: Outcome Measures for Systemic Sclerosis-Related Raynaud's Phenomenon.

Jack D Wilkinson, Sarah A Leggett, Elizabeth J Marjanovic, Tonia L Moore, John Allen, Marina E Anderson, Jason Britton, Maya H Buch, Francesco Del Galdo, Christopher P Denton and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vasodilators for primary Raynaud's phenomenon.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Jack D WilkinsonUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Sarah A LeggettUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK, and Salford Royal Foundation, NHS Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8992-0801
Elizabeth J MarjanovicUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK, and Salford Royal Foundation, NHS Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4229-031X
Tonia L MooreUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK, and Salford Royal Foundation, NHS Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8353-976X
John AllenFreeman Hospital and Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7263-0533
Marina E AndersonUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9073-7505
Jason BrittonLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3145-9274
Maya H BuchNIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Francesco Del GaldoNIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8528-2283
Christopher P DentonUniversity College London Medical School, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3975-8938
Graham DinsdaleUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK, and Salford Royal Foundation, NHS Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6245-2721
Bridgett GriffithsFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Frances HallCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Kevin HowellUniversity College London Medical School, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1810-9867
Audrey MacDonaldFreeman Hospital and Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Neil J McHughRoyal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Royal United Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
Joanne B ManningUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK, and Salford Royal Foundation, NHS Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4959-8387
John D PaulingRoyal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Royal United Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2793-2364
Christopher RobertsUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Jacqueline A ShipleyRoyal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Royal United Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
Ariane L HerrickUniversity of Manchester and NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4941-7926
Andrea K MurrayUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK, and Salford Royal Foundation, NHS Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9244-2882
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBRoyal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases · GBChapel Allerton Hospital · GBFreeman Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 20380Arthritis Research UK 20656Department of Health CDF-2014-07-051Versus Arthritis 20656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReliable and objective outcome measures to facilitate clinical trials of novel treatments for systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) are badly needed. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) and thermography are noninvasive measures of perfusion that have shown excellent potential. This multicenter study was undertaken to determine the reliability and validity of a hand cold challenge protocol using LSCI, standard thermography, and low-cost cell phone/mobile phone thermography (henceforth referred to as mobile thermography) in patients with SSc-related RP.

methodsPatients with RP secondary to SSc were recruited from 6 UK tertiary care centers. The patients underwent cold challenge on 2 consecutive days. Changes in cutaneous blood flow/skin temperature at each visit were imaged simultaneously using LSCI, standard thermography, and mobile thermography. Measurements included area under the curve (AUC) for reperfusion/rewarming and maximum blood flow rate/skin temperature after rewarming (MAX). Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Estimated latent correlations (estimated from multilevel models, taking values between -1 and 1; denoted as rho values) were used to assess the convergent validity of LSCI and thermography.

resultsIn total, 159 patients (77% with limited cutaneous SSc) were recruited (84% female, median age 63.3 years). LSCI and standard thermography both had substantial reliability, with ICCs for the reperfusion/rewarming AUC of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.54, 0.76) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.58, 0.80), respectively, and ICCs for the MAX of 0.64 (95% CI 0.52, 0.75) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.64, 0.81), respectively. Very high latent correlations were present for the AUCs of LSCI and thermography (ρ = 0.94; 95% CI 0.87, 1.00) and for the AUCs of standard and mobile thermography (ρ = 0.98; 95% CI 0.94, 1.00).

conclusionThis is the first multicenter study to examine the reliability and validity of cold challenge using LSCI and thermography in patients with SSc-related RP. LSCI and thermography both demonstrated good potential as outcome measures. LSCI, standard thermography, and mobile thermography had very high convergent validity.

Indexed as

AgedArea Under CurveCold TemperatureContrast MediaDiagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularFeasibility StudiesFemaleFingersHandHumansLasersMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationOutcome Assessment, Health CareRaynaud DiseaseContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID29457381
PMCPMC6001804
OpenAlexW2787148685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.