ArticleMicrocirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994)2018
Modeling the hematocrit distribution in microcirculatory networks: A quantitative evaluation of a phase separation model.
Article in Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- An algorithm for generating biophysically realistic three-dimensional arteriolar networks applied to rat skeletal muscle.Physiological reports · 2025Article
- Blood Flow Simulation and Uncertainty Quantification in Extensive Microvascular Networks: Application to Brain Cortical Networks.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2025Article
- Brief disruptions in capillary flow result in rapid onset of hypoxia.Neurophotonics · 2025Article
- The role of leptomeningeal collaterals in redistributing blood flow during stroke.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Modeling Reactive Hyperemia to Better Understand and Assess Microvascular Function: A Review of Techniques.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Review
- Article
- Predicting Vessel Diameter Changes to Up-Regulate Biphasic Blood Flow During Activation in Realistic Microvascular Networks.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTheoretical models are essential tools for studying microcirculatory function. Recently, the validity of a well-established phase separation model was questioned and it was claimed that it produces problematically low hematocrit predictions and lack of red cells in small diameter vessels. We conducted a quantitative evaluation of this phase separation model to establish common ground for future research.
methodsModel predictions were validated against a comprehensive database with measurements from 4 mesenteric networks. A Bayesian data analysis framework was used to integrate measurements and network model simulations into a combined analysis and to model uncertainties related to network boundary conditions as well as phase separation model parameters. The model evaluation was conducted within a cross-validation scheme.
resultsUnlike the recently reported results, our analysis demonstrated good correspondence in global characteristics between measurements and predictions. In particular, predicted hematocrits for vessels with small diameters were consistent with measurements. Incorporating phase separation model parameter uncertainties further reduced the hematocrit validation error by 17% and led to the absence of red-cell-free segments. Corresponding model parameters are presented as alternatives to standard parameters.
conclusionsConsistent with earlier studies, our quantitative model evaluation supports the continued use of the established phase separation model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.