ArticleMedical physics2018
Radiomics analysis of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT for early detection of lung cancer.
Article in Medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
76 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiomics machine learning models for lung cancer early diagnosis in heterogenous multicentre chest CT data: LIBRA study results.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- [A bidirectional feature mapping classification model based on multi-constrained latent representation learning for differential diagnosis of pneumonia].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026Article
- Body composition radiomics integrated with machine learning to predict prognosis in advanced NSCLC treated with first-line immunochemotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Current trends and future directions of artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnosis.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Radiomics-derived classifier performance evaluation in lung nodule characterization compared with expert radiologists.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Improving Deep Learning Based Lung Nodule Classification Through Optimized Adaptive Intensity Correction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hybrid CNN-transformer model with BM3D and YOLOv8 for early detection of lung cancer in low-dose CT scans.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Radiomics-based high-resolution CT analysis for differentiating primary tumor sources of pulmonary metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Role of Chest CT Radiomics in Differentiating Tumorlets and Granulomas: A Preliminary Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Training Set Augmentation and Harmonization Enables Radiomic Models to Detect Early Onset of Lung Cancer.Research square · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Thoracic Surgery: Transforming Diagnostics, Treatment, and Patient Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Precision Medicine in Lung Cancer Screening: A Paradigm Shift in Early Detection-Precision Screening for Lung Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Radiomic features add incremental benefit to conventional radiological feature-based differential diagnosis of lung nodules.European radiology · 2025Article
- Computed Tomography-Based Radiomic Nomogram to Predict Occult Pleural Metastasis in Lung Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Towards automatical tumor segmentation in radiomics: a comparative analysis of various methods and radiologists for both region extraction and downstream diagnosis.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Integrated multiomics signatures to optimize the accurate diagnosis of lung cancer.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Enhancing cancer risk awareness and screening management through artificial intelligence: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Differentiation of Minute Pulmonary Meningothelial-Like Nodules and Adenocarcinoma In situ with CT RadiomicsCurrent medical imaging · 2025Article
- Precise diagnosis and prognosis assessment of malignant lung nodules: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a radiomics prediction model to improve pulmonary nodule (PN) classification in low-dose CT. To compare the model with the American College of Radiology (ACR) Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) for early detection of lung cancer.
methodsWe examined a set of 72 PNs (31 benign and 41 malignant) from the Lung Image Database Consortium image collection (LIDC-IDRI). One hundred three CT radiomic features were extracted from each PN. Before the model building process, distinctive features were identified using a hierarchical clustering method. We then constructed a prediction model by using a support vector machine (SVM) classifier coupled with a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). A tenfold cross-validation (CV) was repeated ten times (10 × 10-fold CV) to evaluate the accuracy of the SVM-LASSO model. Finally, the best model from the 10 × 10-fold CV was further evaluated using 20 × 5- and 50 × 2-fold CVs.
resultsThe best SVM-LASSO model consisted of only two features: the bounding box anterior-posterior dimension (BB_AP) and the standard deviation of inverse difference moment (SD_IDM). The BB_AP measured the extension of a PN in the anterior-posterior direction and was highly correlated (r = 0.94) with the PN size. The SD_IDM was a texture feature that measured the directional variation of the local homogeneity feature IDM. Univariate analysis showed that both features were statistically significant and discriminative (P = 0.00013 and 0.000038, respectively). PNs with larger BB_AP or smaller SD_IDM were more likely malignant. The 10 × 10-fold CV of the best SVM model using the two features achieved an accuracy of 84.6% and 0.89 AUC. By comparison, Lung-RADS achieved an accuracy of 72.2% and 0.77 AUC using four features (size, type, calcification, and spiculation). The prediction improvement of SVM-LASSO comparing to Lung-RADS was statistically significant (McNemar's test P = 0.026). Lung-RADS misclassified 19 cases because it was mainly based on PN size, whereas the SVM-LASSO model correctly classified 10 of these cases by combining a size (BB_AP) feature and a texture (SD_IDM) feature. The performance of the SVM-LASSO model was stable when leaving more patients out with five- and twofold CVs (accuracy 84.1% and 81.6%, respectively).
conclusionWe developed an SVM-LASSO model to predict malignancy of PNs with two CT radiomic features. We demonstrated that the model achieved an accuracy of 84.6%, which was 12.4% higher than Lung-RADS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.