Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29457191›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2018

Variation in intraocular pressure caused by repetitive positional changes during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing propofol and desflurane anesthesia.

Kwon Hui Seo, Yong-Shin Kim, Jindeok Joo, Jin-Woo Choi, Hong-Soo Jeong, Si-Wook Chung

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kwon Hui SeoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Saint Vincent's Hospital, The College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4397-9207
Yong-Shin KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Saint Vincent's Hospital, The College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. aneskim@catholic.ac.kr.
Jindeok JooDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Saint Vincent's Hospital, The College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Woo ChoiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Saint Vincent's Hospital, The College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hong-Soo JeongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Saint Vincent's Hospital, The College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Si-Wook ChungDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Saint Vincent's Hospital, The College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital · KR

Funding

Saint Vincent's Hospital, Research Institute of Medical Science Foundation SVHR-2016-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery is often prolonged and requires positional changes to facilitate surgical access. Previous studies reported intraocular pressure (IOP) changes in one fixed position. This study investigated the effect of desflurane and propofol anesthesia on IOP during repeated positional changes. A total of 46 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were randomized into desflurane or propofol groups. IOP was measured using a handheld tonometer at seven time points: before induction (baseline), after endotracheal intubation, after pneumoperitoneum, after the first Trendelenburg and right tilt position, after reverse Trendelenburg and right tilt position, after the second Trendelenburg and right tilt position and before endotracheal extubation. Trendelenburg positioning raised IOP in both groups. In the desflurane group, IOP at the first Trendelenburg position was 6.27 and 8.48 mmHg higher than baseline IOP in left and right eye, respectively; IOP at the second Trendelenburg position was 7 and 9.44 mmHg higher than baseline in left and right eye, respectively. In the propofol group, IOP at the first Trendelenburg position was 2.04 and 4.04 mmHg higher than baseline in left and right eyes, respectively. It was 3.04 and 4.87 mmHg higher than baseline in left and right eye, respectively, at the second Trendelenburg position. In the desflurane group, 56.52% patients exhibited high IOP (≥ 25 mmHg) compared with 13.04% in the propofol group at the second Trendelenburg position in the right eyes (P = 0.005). There was a positive correlation between IOP and peak inspiratory pressure (P < 0.001). Propofol anesthesia mitigated wide variations in IOP caused by repetitive positional changes during laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Indexed as

AgedAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousDesfluraneDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleHead-Down TiltHumansIntraocular PressureLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativePatient PositioningPosturePropofolAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousDesfluranePropofolColorectal surgeryDesfluraneIntraocular pressureLaparoscopyPropofolTrendelenburg

Identifiers

PMID29457191
OpenAlexW2792414004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.