Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29457155›Full record

ArticleProceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data2017

VIGAN: Missing View Imputation with Generative Adversarial Networks.

Chao Shang, Aaron Palmer, Jiangwen Sun, Ko-Shin Chen, Jin Lu, Jinbo Bi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A Survey on Multi-View Clustering.IEEE transactions on artificial intelligence · 2021
    Article
  9. A Benchmark for Data Imputation Methods.Frontiers in big data · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. A Survey of Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptation.ACM transactions on intelligent systems and technology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chao ShangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Aaron PalmerDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Jiangwen SunDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Ko-Shin ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Jin LuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Jinbo BiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.

Funding

Quantitative methods to subtype drug dependence and detect novel genetic variantsR01DA037349 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI BI, JINBO · 2015 to 2018
$1.1M
Classifying addictions using machine learning analysis of multidimensional dataK02DA043063 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI BI, JINBO · 2017 to 2021
$809k
NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA043063NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an era when big data are becoming the norm, there is less concern with the quantity but more with the quality and completeness of the data. In many disciplines, data are collected from heterogeneous sources, resulting in multi-view or multi-modal datasets. The missing data problem has been challenging to address in multi-view data analysis. Especially, when certain samples miss an entire view of data, it creates the missing view problem. Classic multiple imputations or matrix completion methods are hardly effective here when no information can be based on in the specific view to impute data for such samples. The commonly-used simple method of removing samples with a missing view can dramatically reduce sample size, thus diminishing the statistical power of a subsequent analysis. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for view imputation via generative adversarial networks (GANs), which we name by VIGAN. This approach first treats each view as a separate domain and identifies domain-to-domain mappings via a GAN using randomly-sampled data from each view, and then employs a multi-modal denoising autoencoder (DAE) to reconstruct the missing view from the GAN outputs based on paired data across the views. Then, by optimizing the GAN and DAE jointly, our model enables the knowledge integration for domain mappings and view correspondences to effectively recover the missing view. Empirical results on benchmark datasets validate the VIGAN approach by comparing against the state of the art. The evaluation of VIGAN in a genetic study of substance use disorders further proves the effectiveness and usability of this approach in life science.

Indexed as

autoencodercycle-consistentdomain mappinggenerative adversarial networksmissing datamissing view

Identifiers

PMID29457155
PMCPMC5813842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.