Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29457147›Full record

ArticleProgress in preventive medicine (New York, N.Y.)2017

A Scoping Review of Health Outcomes Examined in Randomized Controlled Trials Using Guided Imagery.

Peter R Giacobbi, Jonathan Stewart, Keeley Chaffee, Anna-Marie Jaeschke, Meagan Stabler, George A Kelley

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in preventive medicine (New York, N.Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06235255 (A Pilot Intervention Study to Promote Functional Health in Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06235255 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Intervention Study to Promote Functional Health in Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeton Hall UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsHealth BehaviorArmsGuided Imagery, Cognitive Power Intervention, Combined Guided Imagery and Cognitive Power Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter R GiacobbiDepartment of Sport Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Jonathan StewartDepartment of Sport Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Keeley ChaffeeDepartment of Sport Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Anna-Marie JaeschkeDepartment of Sport Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Meagan StablerKansas Department of Health and Environment, Bureau of Health Promotion, Topeka, Kansas.
George A KelleyDepartment of Biostatistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
West Virginia University · US

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI JUDITH FEINBERG · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
WV Prevention Research CenterU48DP005004 · DP · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI DINO, GERI A · 2014 to 2018
$4.3M
WEST VIRGINIA PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTERU48DP001921 · DP · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI DINO, GERI A · 2009 to 2013
$3.8M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001921NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005004NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGuided imagery involves the controlled visualization of detailed mental images. This integrative health technique is used for healing, health maintenance, or the treatment of specific conditions. Guided imagery is an integral part of mindfulness meditation, hypnosis, and various relaxation exercises. However, evidence to support the widespread use and dissemination of guided imagery interventions has been lacking. The purposes of this scoping review were to document the scope of health outcomes and disease processes examined by guided imagery researchers and the journal outlets where this work has been published. Secondary purposes were to review the efficacy of guided imagery, risk of bias from studies published in selected integrative health journals, and gain feedback from clinicians in a practiced-based research network (PBRN) about potential barriers for use in clinical settings.

methodsTen bibliographic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1960 and 2013 that included adult participants. Descriptive and analytic methods were employed to document the journal outlets, diseases, and health outcomes investigated.

results320 RCTs that included more than 17,979 adult participants were reviewed. The published studies appeared in 216 peer-reviewed journals from diverse disciplines largely representing psychology, the sport sciences, rehabilitation, nursing, and medicine. Major outcomes observed were coping with pain, stroke recovery, anxiety, coping with stress, and sport skills. Practitioner feedback from the PBRN revealed some interest but skepticism and time constraints were discussed as barriers.

conclusionsOngoing research and creative dissemination techniques are warranted.

Identifiers

PMID29457147
PMCPMC5812272
OpenAlexW2803291564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.