Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29457129›Full record

ReviewACS biomaterials science & engineering2018

In Vitro Modeling of Mechanics in Cancer Metastasis.

Andrea Malandrino, Roger D Kamm, Emad Moeendarbary

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. 3DACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Angiogenesis: Biological Mechanisms and In Vitro Models.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Engineering Heterogeneous Tumor Models for Biomedical Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mechanobiology in oncology: basic concepts and clinical prospects.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrea MalandrinoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.
Roger D KammDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.
Emad MoeendarbaryDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.
Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia · ESMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Research Supplement - Quantitative analyses of tumor cell extravasationU01CA202177 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KAMM, ROGER D · 2015 to 2020
$4.2M
Cancer Research UK 22057NCI NIH HHS U01 CA202177Wellcome Trust 103883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to a multitude of genetic and biochemical alterations, abnormal morphological, structural, and mechanical changes in cells and their extracellular environment are key features of tumor invasion and metastasis. Furthermore, it is now evident that mechanical cues alongside biochemical signals contribute to critical steps of cancer initiation, progression, and spread. Despite its importance, it is very challenging to study mechanics of different steps of metastasis in the clinic or even in animal models. While considerable progress has been made in developing advanced in vitro models for studying genetic and biological aspects of cancer, less attention has been paid to models that can capture both biological and mechanical factors realistically. This is mainly due to lack of appropriate models and measurement tools. After introducing the central role of mechanics in cancer metastasis, we provide an outlook on the emergence of novel in vitro assays and their combination with advanced measurement technologies to probe and recapitulate mechanics in conditions more relevant to the metastatic disease.

Identifiers

PMID29457129
PMCPMC5811931
OpenAlexW2615677530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.