Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29456870›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2018

A psychosocial intervention for the management of functional dysphonia: complex intervention development and pilot randomised trial.

Vincent Deary, Elaine McColl, Paul Carding, Tracy Miller, Janet Wilson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Lansoprazole for persistent throat symptoms in secondary care: the TOPPITS RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2021
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Integrative Review and Framework of Suggested Mechanisms in Primary Muscle Tension Dysphonia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Web-Based Perceived Present Control Intervention for Voice Disorders: A Pilot Study.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vincent Deary1Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle, NE1 8ST UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6115-9259
Elaine McColl2Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Richardson Road, Newcastle, NE2 4AX UK.
Paul CardingSchool of Allied Health I, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian National Catholic University, KB02, Brisbane, Queensland 4014 Australia.
Tracy MillerDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE7 7DN UK.
Janet WilsonDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE7 7DN UK.
Freeman Hospital · GBAustralian Catholic University · AUNewcastle University · GBNorthumbria University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0501875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedically unexplained loss or alteration of voice-functional dysphonia-is the commonest presentation to speech and language therapists (SLTs). Besides the impact on personal and work life, functional dysphonia is also associated with increased levels of anxiety and depression and poor general health. Voice therapy delivered by SLTs improves voice but not these associated symptoms. The aims of this research were the systematic development of a complex intervention to improve the treatment of functional dysphonia, and the trialling of this intervention for feasibility and acceptability to SLTs and patients in a randomised pilot study.

methodsA theoretical model of medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) was elaborated through literature review and synthesis. This was initially applied as an assessment format in a series of patient interviews. Data from this stage and a small consecutive cohort study were used to design and refine a brief cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) training intervention for a SLT. This was then implemented in an external pilot patient randomised trial where one SLT delivered standard voice therapy or voice therapy plus CBT to 74 patients. The primary outcomes were of the acceptability of the intervention to patients and the SLT, and the feasibility of changing the SLT's clinical practice through a brief training. This was measured through monitoring treatment flow and through structured analysis of the content of intervention for treatment fidelity and inter-treatment contamination.

resultsAs measured by treatment flow, the intervention was as acceptable as standard voice therapy to patients. Analysis of treatment content showed that the SLT was able to conduct a complex CBT formulation and deliver novel treatment strategies for fatigue, sleep, anxiety and depression in the majority of patients. On pre-post measures of voice and quality of life, patients in both treatment arms improved.

conclusionThese interventions were acceptable to patients. Emotional and psychosocial issues presented routinely in the study patient group and CBT techniques were used, deliberately and inadvertently, in both treatment arms. This CBT "contamination" of the voice therapy only arm reflects the chief limitation of the study: one therapist delivered both treatments.

trial registrationRegistered with the ISRCTN under the title:

Indexed as

Cognitive behavioural therapyFunctional dysphoniaMedically unexplained symptomsPilot randomised controlled trialSpeech and language therapy

Identifiers

PMID29456870
PMCPMC5806435
OpenAlexW2793910519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.