Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29456766›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2018

Letter to the editor: blood processing and sample storage have negligible effects on methylation.

Kira Groen, Rodney A Lea, Vicki E Maltby, Rodney J Scott, Jeannette Lechner-Scott

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Epigenetic Biomarkers for Environmental Exposures and Personalized Breast Cancer Prevention.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kira Groen1School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308 Australia.
Rodney A Lea2Centre for Information Based Medicine, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia.
Vicki E Maltby1School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308 Australia.
Rodney J Scott2Centre for Information Based Medicine, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia.
Jeannette Lechner-Scott1School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308 Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation is a dynamic epigenetic mechanism. Researchers aiming to assess archived DNA samples are expressing concern about the effect of technical factors on methylation, as this may confound results. We reviewed recent reports examining this issue in blood samples and concluded that variation in collection, storage, and processing of blood DNA confers negligible effects on both global methylation and methylation status of specific genes. These results are concordant with studies that have investigated the effect of sample storage and processing on methylation in other tissues, such as tumour, sperm, and placenta samples.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationBlood Specimen CollectionDNAEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsPlacentaPregnancySpermatozoaDNABloodDNA extractionMethylationProcessingStorage

Identifiers

PMID29456766
PMCPMC5813389
OpenAlexW2800198248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.