Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29456502›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2018

Efficacy of Cognitive Training in Older Adults with and without Subjective Cognitive Decline Is Associated with Inhibition Efficiency and Working Memory Span, Not with Cognitive Reserve.

Ramón López-Higes, María T Martín-Aragoneses, Susana Rubio-Valdehita, María L Delgado-Losada, Pedro Montejo, Mercedes Montenegro, José M Prados, Jaisalmer de Frutos-Lucas, David López-Sanz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ramón López-HigesDepartment of Cognitive Processes, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
María T Martín-AragonesesDepartment of Methods of Research and Diagnostic in Education, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain.
Susana Rubio-ValdehitaDepartment of Differential and Occupational Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
María L Delgado-LosadaDepartment of Cognitive Processes, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Pedro MontejoCenter for the Prevention of Cognitive Impairment, Madrid-Salud, Madrid, Spain.
Mercedes MontenegroCenter for the Prevention of Cognitive Impairment, Madrid-Salud, Madrid, Spain.
José M PradosDepartment of Cognitive Processes, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jaisalmer de Frutos-LucasLaboratory of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Madrid, Spain.
David López-SanzLaboratory of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study explores the role of cognitive reserve, executive functions, and working memory (WM) span, as factors that might explain training outcomes in cognitive status. Eighty-one older adults voluntarily participated in the study, classified either as older adults with subjective cognitive decline or cognitively intact. Each participant underwent a neuropsychological assessment that was conducted both at baseline (entailing cognitive reserve, executive functions, WM span and depressive symptomatology measures, as well as the Mini-Mental State Exam regarding initial cognitive status), and then 6 months later, once each participant had completed the training program (Mini-Mental State Exam at the endpoint). With respect to cognitive status the training program was most beneficial for subjective cognitive decline participants with low efficiency in inhibition at baseline (explaining a 33% of Mini-Mental State Exam total variance), whereas for cognitively intact participants training gains were observed for those who presented lower WM span.

Indexed as

cognitive reservecognitive statuscognitive trainingefficacyexecutive functionsworking memory

Identifiers

PMID29456502
PMCPMC5801297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.