Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29456191›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Global health2018

Comparative efficacy of low-dose versus standard-dose azithromycin for patients with yaws: a randomised non-inferiority trial in Ghana and Papua New Guinea.

Michael Marks, Oriol Mitjà, Christian Bottomley, Cynthia Kwakye, Wendy Houinei, Mathias Bauri, Paul Adwere, Abdul A Abdulai, Fredrick Dua, Laud Boateng and 18 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02344628 (Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Efficacy of Single Dose Treatment of Yaws With 20mg/kg Versus 30mg/kg of Azithromycin), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02344628 phase3completednot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Efficacy of Single Dose Treatment of Yaws With 20mg/kg Versus 30mg/kg of Azithromycin

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2015 to 2016Enrolled583ConditionsYawsArmsAzithromycin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Yaws in Africa: Past, Present and Future.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Infections caused byClinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay for the Detection ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Advances in the Treatment of Yaws.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Michael MarksClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, UK. Electronic address: michael.marks@lshtm.ac.uk.
Oriol MitjàBarcelona Institute for Global Health, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Lihir Medical Centre, International SOS, Newcrest Mining, Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea.
Christian BottomleyMRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Public Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Cynthia KwakyeGhana Health Services, Accra, Ghana.
Wendy HouineiDepartment of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Mathias BauriDepartment of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Paul AdwereGhana Health Services, Accra, Ghana.
Abdul A AbdulaiGhana Health Services, Accra, Ghana.
Fredrick DuaGhana Health Services, Accra, Ghana.
Laud BoatengGhana Health Services, Accra, Ghana.
James WangiWorld Health Organization Country Office, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Sally-Ann OheneWorld Health Organization Country Office, Accra, Ghana.
Regina WangnapiPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka, Papua New Guinea.
Shirley V SimpsonNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, Accra, Ghana.
Helen MiagDepartment of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Kennedy K AddoNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, Accra, Ghana.
Laud A BasingKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Damien DanavallMolecular Diagnostics and Typing Laboratory, Laboratory Reference and Research Branch, Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kai H ChiMolecular Diagnostics and Typing Laboratory, Laboratory Reference and Research Branch, Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Allan PillayMolecular Diagnostics and Typing Laboratory, Laboratory Reference and Research Branch, Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ronald BallardCenter for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Anthony W SolomonDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cheng Y ChenMolecular Diagnostics and Typing Laboratory, Laboratory Reference and Research Branch, Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sibauk V BiebDepartment of Public Health, National Department of Health, Waigani, Papua New Guinea.
Yaw Adu-SarkodieKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
David C W MabeyClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, UK.
Kingsley AsieduDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
study team
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USGhana Health Service · GHLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research · GHWorld Health Organization · CHPort Moresby General Hospital · PGBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESNational Department of Health · PGPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research · PG

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J01477X/1Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1Wellcome Trust 102807World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA dose of 30 mg/kg of azithromycin is recommended for treatment of yaws, a disease targeted for global eradication. Treatment with 20 mg/kg of azithromycin is recommended for the elimination of trachoma as a public health problem. In some settings, these diseases are co-endemic. We aimed to determine the efficacy of 20 mg/kg of azithromycin compared with 30 mg/kg azithromycin for the treatment of active and latent yaws.

methodsWe did a non-inferiority, open-label, randomised controlled trial in children aged 6-15 years who were recruited from schools in Ghana and schools and the community in Papua New Guinea. Participants were enrolled based on the presence of a clinical lesion that was consistent with infectious primary or secondary yaws and a positive rapid diagnostic test for treponemal and non-treponemal antibodies. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either standard-dose (30 mg/kg) or low-dose (20 mg/kg) azithromycin by a computer-generated random number sequence. Health-care workers assessing clinical outcomes in the field were not blinded to the patient's treatment, but investigators involved in statistical or laboratory analyses and the participants were blinded to treatment group. We followed up participants at 4 weeks and 6 months. The primary outcome was cure at 6 months, defined as lesion healing at 4 weeks in patients with active yaws and at least a four-fold decrease in rapid plasma reagin titre from baseline to 6 months in patients with active and latent yaws. Active yaws was defined as a skin lesion that was positive for Treponema pallidum ssp pertenue in PCR testing. We used a non-inferiority margin of 10%. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02344628.

findingsBetween June 12, 2015, and July 2, 2016, 583 (65·1%) of 895 children screened were enrolled; 292 patients were assigned a low dose of azithromycin and 291 patients were assigned a standard dose of azithromycin. 191 participants had active yaws and 392 had presumed latent yaws. Complete follow-up to 6 months was available for 157 (82·2%) of 191 patients with active yaws. In cases of active yaws, cure was achieved in 61 (80·3%) of 76 patients in the low-dose group and in 68 (84·0%) of 81 patients in the standard-dose group (difference 3·7%; 95% CI -8·4 to 15·7%; this result did not meet the non-inferiority criterion). There were no serious adverse events reported in response to treatment in either group. The most commonly reported adverse event at 4 weeks was gastrointestinal upset, with eight (2·7%) participants in each group reporting this symptom.

interpretationIn this study, low-dose azithromycin did not meet the prespecified non-inferiority margin compared with standard-dose azithromycin in achieving clinical and serological cure in PCR-confirmed active yaws. Only a single participant (with presumed latent yaws) had definitive serological failure. This work suggests that 20 mg/kg of azithromycin is probably effective against yaws, but further data are needed.

fundingCoalition for Operational Research on Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinChildDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGhanaHumansMalePapua New GuineaTreatment OutcomeYawsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycin

Identifiers

PMID29456191
PMCPMC7116878
OpenAlexW2785533754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.