Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29455692›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2018

A non-invasive assessment of skin carotenoid status through reflection spectroscopy is a feasible, reliable and potentially valid measure of fruit and vegetable consumption in a diverse community sample.

Stephanie Bell Jilcott Pitts, Lisa Jahns, Qiang Wu, Nancy E Moran, Ronny A Bell, Kimberly P Truesdale, Melissa N Laska

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie Bell Jilcott Pitts1Department of Public Health,East Carolina University,600 Moye Boulevard,Mailstop 660,Greenville,NC 27834,USA.
Lisa Jahns2USDA/ARS Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center,Grand Forks,ND,USA.
Qiang Wu3Department of Biostatistics,East Carolina University,Greenville,NC,USA.
Nancy E Moran4USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center,Department of Pediatrics,Baylor College of Medicine,Houston,TX,USA.
Ronny A Bell1Department of Public Health,East Carolina University,600 Moye Boulevard,Mailstop 660,Greenville,NC 27834,USA.
Kimberly P Truesdale5Department of Nutrition,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,Chapel Hill,NC,USA.
Melissa N Laska6Division of Epidemiology & Community Health,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,MN,USA.
East Carolina University · USChildren's Nutrition Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine · USGrand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Carotenoid Transport and Interactions with Nutrient AbsorptionR00AT008576 · NCCIH · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MORAN, NANCY E · 2017 to 2019
$747k
NCCIH NIH HHS R00 AT008576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the feasibility, reliability and validity of reflection spectroscopy (RS) to assess skin carotenoids in a racially diverse sample.

designStudy 1 was a cross-sectional study of corner store customers (n 479) who completed the National Cancer Institute Fruit and Vegetable Screener as well as RS measures. Feasibility was assessed by examining the time it took to complete three RS measures, reliability was assessed by examining the variation between three RS measures, and validity was examined by correlation with self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption. In Study 2, validity was assessed in a smaller sample (n 30) by examining associations between RS measures and dietary carotenoids, fruits and vegetables as calculated from a validated FFQ and plasma carotenoids.

settingEastern North Carolina, USA.

resultsIt took on average 94·0 s to complete three RS readings per person. The average variation between three readings for each participant was 6·8 %. In Study 2, in models adjusted for age, race and sex, there were statistically significant associations between RS measures and (i) FFQ-estimated carotenoid intake (P<0·0001); (ii) FFQ-estimated fruit and vegetable consumption (P<0·010); and (iii) plasma carotenoids (P<0·0001).

conclusionsRS is a potentially improved method to approximate fruit and vegetable consumption among diverse participants. RS is portable and easy to use in field-based public health nutrition settings. More research is needed to investigate validity and sensitivity in diverse populations.

Indexed as

FruitVegetablesAdultCarotenoidsCross-Sectional StudiesDiet SurveysFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNorth CarolinaPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsSkinSpectrum AnalysisTime FactorsCarotenoidsCarotenoidsFruitHealth promotionVegetables

Identifiers

PMID29455692
PMCPMC6200334
OpenAlexW2791385582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.