Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29455468›Full record

ReviewImmunology2018

Implications of macrophage polarization in autoimmunity.

Samanta C Funes, Mariana Rios, Jorge Escobar-Vera, Alexis M Kalergis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 541 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
541citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

541 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 966 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Phenotypic switching of gastrointestinal smooth muscle cells and the regulatory role of macrophages: a literature review.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. POSTNOncology reports · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

481 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samanta C FunesFacultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Departamento de Genética Molecular y Microbiología, Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Mariana RiosFacultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Departamento de Genética Molecular y Microbiología, Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Jorge Escobar-VeraFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento Biomédico, Laboratorio de Genética, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile.
Alexis M KalergisFacultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Departamento de Genética Molecular y Microbiología, Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-7622-5263
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLUniversidad de Antofagasta · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages are extremely heterogeneous and plastic cells with an important role not only in physiological conditions, but also during inflammation (both for initiation and resolution). In the early 1990s, two different phenotypes of macrophages were described: one of them called classically activated (or inflammatory) macrophages (M1) and the other alternatively activated (or wound-healing) macrophages (M2). Currently, it is known that functional polarization of macrophages into only two groups is an over-simplified description of macrophage heterogeneity and plasticity; indeed, it is necessary to consider a continuum of functional states. Overall, the current available data indicate that macrophage polarization is a multifactorial process in which a huge number of factors can be involved producing different activation scenarios. Once a macrophage adopts a phenotype, it still retains the ability to continue changing in response to new environmental influences. The reversibility of polarization has a critical therapeutic value, especially in diseases in which an M1/M2 imbalance plays a pathogenic role. In this review, we assess the high plasticity of macrophages and their potential to be exploited to reduce chronic/detrimental inflammation. On the whole, the evidence detailed in this review underscores macrophage polarization as a target of interest for immunotherapy.

Indexed as

AutoimmunityAnimalsAutoimmune DiseasesCytokinesHeme Oxygenase (Decyclizing)HumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousInflammation MediatorsMacrophage ActivationMacrophagesPhenotypeCytokinesHeme Oxygenase (Decyclizing)Immunoglobulins, IntravenousInflammation MediatorsautoimmunityM1M2macrophage alternative activationmacrophage polarization

Identifiers

PMID29455468
PMCPMC5980179
OpenAlexW2793011605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.