ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2018
Predictive Performance of Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Models in Predicting Drug-Drug Interactions Involving Enzyme Modulation.
Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Enables Rapid Prediction of Acid-Reducing Agent Drug Interactions: A Streamlined Complement to PBPK Modeling.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics Modeling for Evaluating Drug-Drug Interactions in Polypharmacy: Development and Challenges.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2024Review
- Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to predict the effect of risperidone on aripiprazole pharmacokinetics in subjects with different CYP2D6 genotypes and individuals with hepatic impairment.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2024Article
- Investigation of CYP3A induction by PF-05251749 in early clinical development: comparison of linear slope physiologically based pharmacokinetic prediction and biomarker response.Clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Prediction of cytochromes P450 3A and 2C19 modulation by both inflammation and drug interactions using physiologically based pharmacokinetics.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022Article
- Predicting the Drug-Drug Interaction Mediated by CYP3A4 Inhibition: Method Development and Performance Evaluation.The AAPS journal · 2021Article
- Drug Dosing Recommendations for All Patients: A Roadmap for Change.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021Review
- Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Approach to Identify the Drug-Drug Interaction Mechanism of Nifedipine and a Proton Pump Inhibitor, Omeprazole.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2021Article
- Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Predictions of the Effect of Curcumin on Metabolism of Imatinib and Bosutinib: In Vitro and In Vivo Disconnect.Pharmaceutical research · 2020Article
- Comparative Study of Protective Effect of Cimetidine and Verapamil on Paracetamol-Induced Hepatotoxicity in Mice.International journal of hepatology · 2020Article
- Current trends in drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2019Review
- Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling of Hyperforin to Predict Drug Interactions with St John's Wort.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling in predicting metabolic drug-drug interactions (mDDIs) is routinely used in drug development. Currently, the US FDA endorses the use of PBPK to potentially support dosing recommendations for investigational drugs as enzyme substrates of mDDIs, and to inform a lack of mDDIs for investigational drugs as enzyme modulators.
methodsWe systematically evaluated the performance of PBPK modeling in predicting mDDIs published in the literature. Models developed to assess both investigational drugs as enzyme substrates (Groups 1 and 2, as being inhibited and induced, respectively) or enzyme modulators (Groups 3 and 4, as inhibitors and inducers, respectively) were evaluated. Predicted ratios of the area under the curve (AUCRs) and/or maximum plasma concentration (C
resultsFor Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, 62, 50, 44, and 43% of model-predicted AUCRs, respectively, were within a predefined threshold of 1.25-fold of observed values (0.8-1.25x). When the threshold was widened to twofold, the values increased to 100, 80, 81, and 86% (0.5-2.0x). For Groups 3 and 4, prediction for mDDI liability (the existence or lack of mDDIs) using PBPK appears to be satisfactory.
conclusionOur analysis supports the FDA's current recommendations on the use of PBPK to predict mDDIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29455429What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.