Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2018
Respiratory quotient estimations as additional prognostic tools in early septic shock.
Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of COAnnals of intensive care · 2025Review
- Regional venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide pressure and content differences during endotoxemic shock: influence of hydrogen ion accumulation vs. Haldane effect.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Markers of Tissue Perfusion as Predictors of Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024Article
- Evaluation of respiratory exchange ratio (RER) for predicting postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing oncological resection for gastrointestinal malignancies - A prospective cohort study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- Insulin and cancer: a tangled web.The Biochemical journal · 2022Review
- The Prediction of Surgery Outcomes in Abdominal Tumor Patients with Sepsis by Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2022Article
- Ratio of venous-to-arterial PCOScientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- How can COJournal of thoracic disease · 2019Review
- Blood COJournal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2019Article
- In response: Blood COJournal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byBlood CO2019
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (P
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.