ArticleAnnals of intensive care2018
Fluid therapy and outcome: a prospective observational study in 65 German intensive care units between 2010 and 2011.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01122277 (Klinisches Register RaFTinG - Rational Fluid Therapy in Germany), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Klinisches Register RaFTinG - Rational Fluid Therapy in Germany
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative predictors of critical care admission following emergency surgical procedures: a comprehensive evaluation of anesthesia management.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
- Early Positive Fluid Balance Associates with Increased Mortality in Neurological Critically Ill Patients: A 10-Year Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Colloids Yes or No? - a "Gretchen Question" Answered.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Review
- A Prospective Observational Study of Rational Fluid Therapy in Asian Intensive Care Units: Another Puzzle Piece in Fluid Therapy.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020Article
- Re: Clinical Trials in Volume Resuscitation with Hydroxyethyl Starch: Focus on Risk of Bias.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2020Article
- Clinical Trials in Volume Resuscitation with Hydroxyethyl Starch: Focus on Risk of Bias.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2020Article
- Understanding the Harms of HES: A Review of the Evidence to Date.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2019Review
- The SSAI fully supports the suspension of hydroxyethyl-starch solutions commissioned by the European Medicines Agency.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOutcome data on fluid therapy in critically ill patients from randomised controlled trials may be different from data obtained by observational studies under "real-life" conditions. We conducted this prospective, observational study to investigate current practice of fluid therapy (crystalloids and colloids) and associated outcomes in 65 German intensive care units (ICUs). In total, 4545 adult patients who underwent intravenous fluid therapy were included. The main outcome measures were 90-day mortality, ICU mortality and acute kidney injury (AKI). Data were analysed using logistic and Cox regression models, as appropriate.
resultsIn the predominantly post-operative overall cohort, unadjusted 90-day mortality was 20.1%. Patients who also received colloids (54.6%) had a higher median Simplified Acute Physiology Score II [25 (interquartile range 11; 41) vs. 17 (7; 31)] and incidence of severe sepsis (10.2 vs. 7.4%) on admission compared to patients who received exclusively crystalloids (45.4%). 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4) was the most common colloid (57.0%). Crude rates of 90-day mortality were higher for patients who received colloids (OR 1.845 [1.560; 2.181]). After adjustment for baseline variables, the HR was 1.666 [1.405; 1.976] and further decreased to indicate no associated risk (HR 1.003 [0.980; 1.027]) when it was adjusted for vasopressor use, severity of disease and transfusions. Similarly, the crude risk of AKI was higher in the colloid group (crude OR 3.056 [2.528; 3.694]), after adjustment for baseline variables OR 1.941 [1.573; 2.397], and after full adjustment OR 0.696 [0.629; 0.770]), the risk of AKI turned out to be reduced. The same was true for the subgroup of patients treated with 6% HES 130/0.4 (crude OR 1.931 [1.541; 2.419], adjusted for baseline variables OR 2.260 [1.730; 2.953] and fully adjusted OR 0.800 [0.704; 0.910]) as compared to crystalloids only.
conclusionsThe present analysis of mostly post-operative patients in routine clinical care did not reveal an independent negative effect of colloids (mostly 6% HES 130/0.4) on renal function or survival after multivariable adjustment. Signals towards a reduced risk in subgroup analyses deserve further study. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01122277, registered May 11th, 2010.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.