Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29455302›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

Patient experiences of a physiotherapy-led multidisciplinary rehabilitative intervention after successful treatment for oesophago-gastric cancer.

A E Bennett, L O'Neill, D Connolly, E M Guinan, L Boland, S L Doyle, J O'Sullivan, J V Reynolds, J Hussey

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Exploring patients and caregivers needs and experiences in oncological physiotherapy: a call for collaborative care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Role of Physical Activity in Cancer Recovery: An Exercise Practitioner's Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A E BennettDepartment of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin 8, Ireland. abennet@tcd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9674-3911
L O'NeillDiscipline of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin 8, Ireland.
D ConnollyDiscipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin 8, Ireland.
E M GuinanSchool of Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin 8, Ireland.
L BolandDiscipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin 8, Ireland.
S L DoyleSchool of Biological Sciences, Dublin Institute of Technology, Kevin Street, Dublin 8, Ireland.
J O'SullivanDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin 8, Ireland.
J V ReynoldsDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin 8, Ireland.
J HusseyDiscipline of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Trinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Health Research Board HRA-POR-2014-535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo qualitatively explore the perceived impact of a 12-week rehabilitative intervention for oesophago-gastric cancer survivors on their physical, mental and social wellbeing.

methodsOf the 21 participants who completed the intervention, 19 took part in a semi-structured focus group interview. Four audio-taped focus groups were held, ranging in size from two to eight participants. Focus groups were transcribed and analysed using a descriptive qualitative approach.

resultsAt recruitment, participants were 23.5 ± 15.2 months post-surgery and all had suboptimal fitness levels. Participants reported improvements in their physical capacity and ability to carry out activities of daily living during the intervention. These improvements led to increased confidence and social connectivity. Other participants were a valuable source of information and reassurance, while support from family members was variable. Future interventions should educate participants on how to maintain gains achieved during the intervention.

conclusionsParticipating in an exercise-based multidisciplinary rehabilitative intervention reduces isolation and helps oesophago-gastric cancer survivors to safely negotiate their physical, emotional and social needs as they move further down the path of recovery.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Therapy ModalitiesStomach NeoplasmsSurvivorsConfidenceExerciseGastric cancerOesophageal cancerPhysiotherapyRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID29455302
OpenAlexW2789116207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.