Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29455300›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

Patterns of oral and dental care education and utilization in head and neck cancer patients.

Joel B Epstein, Derek K Smith, Dana Villines, Ira Parker, Jeff Hameroff, Brian R Hill, Barbara A Murphy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patient-reported evaluation of oral/dental health in oncology care-a need and opportunity to support medically necessary oral care needs.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Survey of experiences and barriers to dental care post-head and neck cancer in OraRad study participants.Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joel B EpsteinCedars-Sinai Health System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Derek K SmithVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Derek.k.smith@vanderbilt.edu.
Dana VillinesAdvocate Health Care Department of Research, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ira ParkerGeriatric Oncology Solutions, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jeff HameroffPrivate practice and Emery University, 7320 Forest Oaks Blvd, Spring Hill, FL, USA.
Brian R HillOral Cancer Foundation, 3419 Via Lido #205, Newport Beach, CA, 92663, USA.
Barbara A MurphyVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to examine patterns of oral health care among patients undergoing oral cancer therapy in order to better understand how oral care is being utilized, what types of providers are being utilized at various stages of cancer therapy, and assessing patients' satisfaction with the care they received at these stages.

methodsAn online survey was conducted via the Oral Cancer Foundation's support group message board. Participants were asked about their oral care immediately prior to cancer therapy, during cancer therapy, and post cancer therapy. The participants were also given the opportunity to provide open response feedback on their oral care which was analyzed qualitatively.

resultsSeventy-four participants completed the survey. Participants reported being informed that they needed to receive an oral evaluation 72.6 and 53.6% of the time in the pre- and post-treatment stages, respectively. Compliance with this recommendation was 71.2% pre cancer therapy but dropped precipitously to 49.2% post cancer therapy. Pre- and post-therapy oral care was provided most commonly by the patient's usual dentist 41.1 and 55.9%, respectively, with medical providers predominating the treatment phase, 77.7%. Patients reported dissatisfaction rates of 29.0, 20.6, and 21.0% sequentially.

conclusionsThere is a general lack of consistency with how, when, and from whom oral cancer patients receive their oral health education. It is likely that this contributes to insufficient education resulting in high levels of patient dissatisfaction with their oral care.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesDental CareFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOral HealthPatient Education as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesHead and neck cancerOral healthPatient educationSurvivorship

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.