Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29455253›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2018

Incorporation of the fluoroless C-Arm Trainer at the American Urological Association hands on training percutaneous renal access.

Yasser A Noureldin, David M Hoenig, Philip Zhao, Sammy E Elsamra, Joshua Stern, Geoffrey Gaunay, Piruz Motamedinia, Zeph Okeke, Ardeshir R Rastinehad, Robert M Sweet

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Innovations in Urologic Surgical Training.Current urology reports · 2021
    Review
  2. Augmented reality simulator for ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal access.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020
    Article
  3. Introduction of an ex-vivo pig model for teaching percutaneous nephrolithotomy access techniques.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yasser A NoureldinDepartment of Surgery, WWAMI Institute for Simulation in Healthcare (WISH), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
David M HoenigThe Smith Institute for Urology, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Philip ZhaoDepartment of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Sammy E ElsamraThe Smith Institute for Urology, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Joshua SternDepartment of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Geoffrey GaunayThe Smith Institute for Urology, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Piruz MotamediniaThe Smith Institute for Urology, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Zeph OkekeThe Smith Institute for Urology, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Ardeshir R RastinehadIcahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Robert M SweetDepartment of Surgery, WWAMI Institute for Simulation in Healthcare (WISH), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. rsweet@uw.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess for usefulness and validity evidence for incorporating the C-Arm Trainer (CAT) simulator into the annual AUA hands on course for training percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe course started with a didactic session followed by four stations for training the "bull's eye" technique using the CAT simulator. Each station included a pre-test, 30-min practice on the simulator, and post-test. All participants were assessed using a 4-item checklist. All participants were asked to fill in a qualitative self-assessment questionnaire after the pre- and the post-test, and respond to a course evaluation questionnaire and post-course survey.

resultsA total of 38 physicians, who attended the hands on course, voluntarily participated in the study. Only 21.1% had previous practice on PCNL simulators. Compared with the results of the checklist total score and the qualitative self-assessment questionnaire scores after the pre-test, there was significant improvement in the checklist total score (p < 0.001), temporal demands (p = 0.003), situational stress (p = 0.003, and performance (0.003) after the post-test. A total of 14 (36%) participants responded to the course evaluation questionnaire, 50% evaluated the course as excellent, 28.6% as very good, and 21.4% as good. Unfortunately, only five (13%) participants responded to the post-course survey, 4/5 implemented the new competencies and knowledge into their practice, and 3/5 have attempted to obtain fluoroscopic guided PCA without assistance.

conclusionThe CAT simulator was considered useful for training the percutaneous renal access procedure. There was significant improvement in the qualitative and quantitative assessment parameters after the post-test compared with the pre-test.

Indexed as

AdultChecklistClinical CompetenceFemaleFluoroscopyHumansKidney CalicesMaleNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousProspective StudiesSimulation TrainingUltrasonography, InterventionalAssessmentPercutaneous NephrolithotomySkillsTraining

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.