Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29454884›Full record

ArticleVision research2018

Illusory edges comingle with real edges in the neural representation of objects.

Sarah L Elliott, Steven K Shevell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah L ElliottDepartment of Psychology, Roosevelt University, 430 S. Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL 60605, United States; Institute for Mind & Biology, University of Chicago, United States. Electronic address: selliott@peppermillcas.com.
Steven K ShevellDepartment of Psychology, The University of Chicago, 940 E. 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637, United States; Institute for Mind & Biology, University of Chicago, United States; Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, University of Chicago, United States.

Funding

CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL PROCESSES IN VISUAL ADAPTATIONR01EY004802 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SHEVELL, STEVEN K · 1985 to 2011
$2.9M
Resolution of chromatic ambiguity in mid-level visionR01EY026618 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SHEVELL, STEVEN K · 2016 to 2018
$1.2M
Color appearance and its relation to perceptual organizationF32EY021036 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ELLIOTT, SARAH LYNN · 2010 to 2013
$137k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY021036NEI NIH HHS R01 EY004802NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual system must transform a point-by-point biological representation from the photoreceptors into neural representations of separate objects. Even a uniform circular patch of light that slowly modulates in luminance can be segmented into separate central and surrounding areas merely by introducing black lines to outline a central square. The black lines cause brightness induction in the center even though the light inside and outside the square is always identical, as predicted by spatial antagonism between the square central area and its surround. Importantly, illusory Kanizsa lines forming the square are as effective for this brightness induction as real black lines, suggesting a 'form-cue invariant' cortical neural representation that does not distinguish between a central region set off by real or illusory edges. An open question is whether separate subsystems generate objects defined by real versus illusory edges, each providing the same form-cue invariant neural representation of an object, or whether form-cue invariance extends to integrating component pieces that together define an object. Experiments here show object segmentation when subparts of a square are defined by a mixture of real and illusory edges. Subjects adjusted the Michelson contrast of a separate patch to match the perceived modulation depth within the central region of a circular field that slowly oscillated in luminance. A closed, four-sided figure, no matter how constructed, reduced the perceived modulation depth within the central region. This shows that both real and illusory subparts can be integrated to segment center from surround. It supports a strong version of form-cue invariance in which neural mechanisms responsible for object segmentation are impartial to the piecemeal cues that are integrated to define an object.

Indexed as

Optical IllusionsAdultContrast SensitivityDepth PerceptionFemaleForm PerceptionHumansMaleVisual CortexYoung AdultIllusory figuresNeural mechanismsObject perception

Identifiers

PMID29454884
PMCPMC5866783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.