ReviewTrends in neurosciences2018
Flexible Neural Hardware Supports Dynamic Computations in Retina.
Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-term plasticity and context-dependent circuit function: Insights from retinal circuitry.Science advances · 2024Review
- Mapping the Retina onto the Brain.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
- ON and OFF Signaling Pathways in the Retina and the Visual System.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Dopamine D1 and D4 receptors contribute to light adaptation in ON-sustained retinal ganglion cells.Journal of neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Realistic retinal modeling unravels the differential role of excitation and inhibition to starburst amacrine cells in direction selectivity.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Unraveling neural coding of dynamic natural visual scenes via convolutional recurrent neural networks.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Article
- Cortical synaptic architecture supports flexible sensory computations.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2020Review
- Intraocular Pressure Elevation Compromises Retinal Ganglion Cell Light Adaptation.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- Article
- Review
- Rod Photoresponse Kinetics Limit Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in Mesopic Vision.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- The dynamic receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2018Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The ability of the retina to adapt to changes in mean light intensity and contrast is well known. Classically, however, adaptation is thought to affect gain but not to change the visual modality encoded by a given type of retinal neuron. Recent findings reveal unexpected dynamic properties in mouse retinal neurons that challenge this view. Specifically, certain cell types change the visual modality they encode with variations in ambient illumination or following repetitive visual stimulation. These discoveries demonstrate that computations performed by retinal circuits with defined architecture can change with visual input. Moreover, they pose a major challenge for central circuits that must decode properties of the dynamic visual signal from retinal outputs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.